Talk:Battle of Shanhai Pass

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 27, 2014, May 27, 2016, May 27, 2019, and May 27, 2024.

China: History High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as High-importance).

Military history: Asian / Chinese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Assessment

This article contains all the basic information, including a prelude, aftermath, and some detail of the battle itself, as well as an infobox. I do not know if further detail of the battle is available, or an image for the infobox, but these seem to be the only glaring omissions. LordAmeth 16:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added picture for infobox. -- Миборо в ский 00:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources anyone? To have this much detail it must have been gotten from a book. At least list the book, even if it's in some other language (namely of course in Chinese). Of even a website is better than nothing. ParallelPain 06:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extensive revision

The article claims that the battle was fought in April 1644; I have a book source (Davis, Paul K. 100 Decisive Battles: From Ancient Times to the Present. ISBN 0-19-514366-3) that dates the battle to 28 May 1644. Where does the April date come from?

I presume that the May one is correct; April doesn't make sense, as Beijing didn't fall to Li Zicheng's forces until the 25th of that month. I thought that the difference was caused by the gap between the Julian and Gregorian calendars, or something like that, but that was only 10 days in 1644. I'll try to go through the article later and correct the problem. Segregold (talk) 22:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Segregold, You're right: all the dates in the articles were wrong because whoever wrote it converted "4th day of the 4th lunar month" directly into "April 4th" all throughout the wiki. In other words, they took lunar dates as direct equivalent of the Gregorian calendar. Madalibi (talk) 04:22, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and more or less completely rewrote the article. The information here contradicted what I myself had read and what the linked internet source indicated, and seems to have been based on a discredited 1898 history of China. If anyone who knows more about the battle than I do can make further corrections, I encourage you to do so. Segregold (talk) 00:08, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the paragraphs you left in your re-writing out might have contained relevant information. I'll try to see what I can do. Thanks for taking care of the article! Madalibi (talk) 04:22, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What to do with the "Timeline"

I'm almost done rewriting this wiki. Among other things, I added a detailed "Timeline" at the end, but I'm not sure where this timeline fits best. Should it come at the beginning? Is it right where it should be? Should it be moved to its own wiki (Timeline of the Battle of Shanhai Pass)? Any suggestions? Thanks! Madalibi (talk) 13:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted vandalism

Just reverted 3 separate occasions of vandalism by 213.55.84.66 on 5 December 2013. In the 'edit summary' I forgot to include that the revert was going back to my edit at 15:54, 9 November 2013 (the last good edit before the vandalism). Sorry. Xenxax (talk) 13:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)‎[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Shanhai Pass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080516072257/http://www.china-defense.com/history/1644/1644-10.html to http://www.china-defense.com/history/1644/1644-10.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Popular Culture?

Is the battle in this film a loosely-connected version of this battle? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120762/?ref_=nv_sr_1 Terry Thorgaard (talk) 21:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wording

The intro paragraph says that the battle led to the formation of the Qing, but the first paragraph describes "Qing" forces fighting Ming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.115.97.89 (talk) 02:20, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weapons /technology used?

I think it would be good if this article contained some information about what kind of weapons the two sides were using. I don't know anything about Chinese warfare in this period, but the year is 1644 so does that mean there were muskets and artillery being used or was it all swords and crossbows, or what? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LastDodo (talk • contribs) 16:01, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]