Talk:Battle of Fishguard

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Fishguard article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / French / Napoleonic era Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Confused

This article makes no sense - if the cannon shot turned the fleet around, how were 13 soldiers captured by a lady, and how did they surrender? Did this even happen? --Awiseman 18:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The point of the story is that it did not really make sense, therefore made the french look bad. Edited the article to explain the cannon. 12 Soldiers I believe. Apparently they believed that the red-coated Welshwomen where British troops (Red uniforms). Yes - it did happen. Agathoclea 23:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it makes a lot more sense now. --Awiseman 16:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It makes sense but its still fucking hilarious, these hardened criminal conscript soldiers surrendered to a pack of women! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.180.155 (talk) 11:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article sounds like a 'pub story'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.192.138.92 (talk) 00:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have just heard it on the BBC TV series Coast. Pretty much confirmed most of the article, including the women in welsh costume being confused with grenadier guards. Billlion (talk) 21:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

French in Ireland

I have made a mention of the French landing in Ireland in 1798, the other attempted invasion of British territory by the French.

This was the last time a Continental army set foot on Irish soil and therefore is not unlike the Fishguard incident, though arguably the French invasion of Ireland was a greater danger to Britain than the French landing in Wales.

Inchiquin (talk) 01:44, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree with the inclusion - its worth pointing out that Ireland wasn't British territory at the time but a seperate Kingdom of Ireland with a dual-monarch with Britain and a closely integrated system. However the two expeditions were very much-linked, the landing in Ireland had meant to have taken place first but was delayed. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 01:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name

While it was undoubtly the last sucsesfull invasion of Britain, is that the most common name? I more commonly here it described as the French Invasion of Wales. Possibly the current title could be a re-direct to that. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 01:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking around, I see it mentioned as "last invasion of Britain" primarily as book titles looking for something catchy or memorials. The name I'm seeing around is the Battle of Fishguard, perhaps that would be the most ideal article title. -- Sabre (talk) 12:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it and edited the page a little to reflect this. -- Love, Smurfy 19:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Piffle and poppycock - locally it has always been the Last Invasion (see for example the centenary plaque and bicentenary tapestry). There was no battle and certainly not at Fishguard. The only possible reason for calling it the Battle of Fishguard is to justify the Pembrokeshire Yeomanry battle honours. The only argument I can see for not changing the name back to Last Invasion is that the internet has now become so contaminated by this link that it will confuse the ignorant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trewenb (talk • contribs) 07:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Battle

Is there an order of battle available anywhere for the forces involved? 155.213.224.59 (talk) 16:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Fishguard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090427193635/http://www.wargame.ch/wc/nwc/newsletter/21st_edition/Newsletter21/fishguard.html to http://www.wargame.ch/wc/nwc/newsletter/21st_edition/Newsletter21/fishguard.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decisive victory discussion

Regarding the current disagreement: There is a discussion on the use of decisive victory in infoboxes and article bodies going on at the WikiProject Military History talk page. (Hohum ^@) 12:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

William Tate Coup

I can't find anything online about a failed coup in New Orleans. His own wikipedia page states that he fled back to France due to disobeying orders when recruiting soldiers and "treason", but I can't find any source that even hints at any coup in New Orleans. Brinkman 314 (talk) 03:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]