Talk:Battle of Boju

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Chinese / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Shiji

@CCHIPSS: I noticed that you just added a lot of info from Sima Qian's Shiji to the article. Your effort is greatly appreciated. However, please be aware that modern historians generally agree that Sima Qian's accounts are less reliable than those of the much earlier Zuo Zhuan, which were also far more detailed, and he invented a lot of the exploits of Sun Wu, who was not mentioned in earlier historical texts. I don't think we should rely too much on Sima Qian. -Zanhe (talk) 22:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it is helpful to include Sima Qian's account and then qualify it with the modern historians' (sourced) consensus to explain why his account might be less reliable. _dk (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is Sima Qian's account is very barebones compared with the Zuo Zhuan. It basically summarizes the Zuo Zhuan, while adding a bit of extra stuff about Sun Tzu and Wu Zixu, which is not considered trustworthy by most modern historians, although it's very influential. -Zanhe (talk) 21:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Boju. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]