Talk:Ballistic nylon

Military history: Technology / Weaponry Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Textile arts Low‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile artsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile artsTemplate:WikiProject Textile artsTextile arts articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The strap in the picture (of the diving watch) is not made from ballistic nylon. It's pretty obvious that it doesn't use a basketweave.

Ballistic Nylon - A specific nylon developed by Dupont for the U.S. Department of Defense for use in flak jackets. Later it was replaced by Kevlar. The basket-weave construction helps add abrasion resistance as opposed to a plain weave. The name is used as a marketing tool with ballistic sounding like something "bulletproof" therefore really tough. Many motorcycle apparel companies us the word "Ballistic" when describing material. In many cases the material's tear and abrasion strength does not meet a minimum standard for motorcycle apparel and the word is used only as a sales gimmick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.178.8.81 (talk • contribs) 10 September 2005

1050 denier ballistic nylon is better quality than 1680, but how does 1050 compare to 2520? Is 2520 woven with a 2-ply weave like 1050 or with a thick single yarn like 1680? Does 2520 become fuzzy as easily as 1680? If 2520 is stronger than 1050, is it just as strong for its denier weight or is it only stronger because it is much heavier? —Preceding comment added by 99.232.52.30 (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ballistic nylon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110617052936/http://www.dstan.mod.uk/standards/defstans/66/047/00000200.pdf to http://www.dstan.mod.uk/standards/defstans/66/047/00000200.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]