This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bahrain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Kingdom of Bahrain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BahrainWikipedia:WikiProject BahrainTemplate:WikiProject BahrainBahrain
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey
Article does not meet GNG for a stand alone article and is an unnecessary CFORK of the target article which fragments the subject. Both the target article and the source content will be better after the merge. // Timothy :: talk23:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, as other articles like Turkey-United States relations and Embassy of Turkey, Washington, D.C. seem to be fine, to me. The relations page serves as a broader overview of everything about the diplomatic situation between the nations, while the embassy page concerns just the mission of Turkey to Bahrain (along with the building and any events there). I think the current situation, with the articles apart, is fine. The two articles may both need more info to be better articles, but I don’t think merging is a good way to improve them. Starkenborgher (talk) 05:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
