Talk:Baha' al-Din Naqshband
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This article doesn't need an overhaul IMHO, it should be kept as it is only for its entertainment value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.173.222.169 (talk) 23:32, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
This article is long, unwieldy, hard to read, and not at all written in wiki style. it desperately needs an overhaul. 99.231.200.55 (talk) 08:23, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Article needing Simple Editing
[edit]This article needs simple editing for grammatical typos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackLuna (talk • contribs) 21:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Article is fine
[edit]I find no problem with this article, no wonder Wikipedia is in a state of malaise with such ridiculous criticisms. 09:24, 1 February 2015 (UTC)~~
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Baha-ud-Din Naqshband Bukhari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131227114618/http://www.haqqanisoul.com/profiles/blogs/yawm-a-wilaadat to http://www.haqqanisoul.com/profiles/blogs/yawm-a-wilaadat
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:25, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Do not delete earlier articles and links that were added by different editors in different periods of time!
[edit]The editor User:HistoryofIran has removed some sources and references that mention the genealogy of Bahauddin Naqshband. I ask you not to delete previously added sources and links by other users, editors in different periods. There are links to sources. I ask you to consider. Be prudent, there are different opinions of scientists about the origin of Naqshband. It will be fair if we indicate all these sources and links on the page. Please respect the contributions of other editors... Tair mansur (talk) 12:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- You've already been told that you're not allowed to edit through multiple accounts. We have something called guidelines/rules, which you keep breaking. The revision you're trying to reinstate is not WP:RS and is riddled with POV. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- dear bro, respect to you for your contributions to the wiki, but please don't confuse us with other vadals plz. all that I personally added have links to sources. Amanjol (talk) 13:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- Nice of you to log into another account. I have already reported you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:48, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- dear bro, respect to you for your contributions to the wiki, but please don't confuse us with other vadals plz. all that I personally added have links to sources. Amanjol (talk) 13:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)