Talk:Baelor/GA1

GA Reassessment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As User:He to Hecuba, who performed the initial Good Article review of this article, has been blocked as the sock of a banned user, I'm going to perform an individual reassessment of this article per this thread at WT:GAN. Comments to follow soon. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All I ask is that if you identify fixes needed, that I be given at least a week to make them. I am traveling at the moment, and currently am working on improving Fire and Blood (Game of Thrones) per the GA reviewer's suggestions. Thanks, Jclemens (talk) 03:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, I doubt I'll find anything serious. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:
I made some copyediting changes, feel free to revert if I accidentally introduced errors to the article. (I do that sometimes.)
They look fine, thanks. Jclemens (talk) 02:19, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"After some hard bargaining, Frey agrees to allow the Stark army to cross through The Twins and join them against the Lannisters,..." I'm a bit confused, who does "them" refer to here?
clarified. Jclemens (talk) 02:19, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why is the IGN reviewer given his own paragraph? Is there a good way to work him into one of the earlier paragraphs? Mark Arsten (talk) 16:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, moved it up to the end of the first reception paragraph. Jclemens (talk) 02:19, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm on the fence about the third paragraph of the lead, I'm not sure if the detail about the previous king is merited. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:45, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, moved it into the writing section. Jclemens (talk) 02:19, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'm certainly satisfied that this meets the GA critera and am closing the GAR as "Kept". Thanks to everyone who helped. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.