This article is within the scope of the Greater Boston Public Transit WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of public transportation in the Greater Boston metropolitan area. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Greater Boston Public TransitWikipedia:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitTemplate:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitGreater Boston Public Transit articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
Can someone please explain the notability for this article? First of all, it's a misnomer -- "Back of the Hill" is not a "station"; it's a stop. For those who don't live in the area but have some familiarity with surface rail, the "E" line runs above ground after the "Symphony" stop. It stops every block or two. Some of the stops have platforms (e.g., "Longwood", "Heath Street") and would be considered "stations". Others of the stops are simply marked by a street sign on the sidewalk, people wait on the sidewalk by the sign as they would at any bus stop, and the train stops in the middle of the street. .... So, not a train station, and not only is there no train station at this stop, there is no historic or other significance of any kind that I can see. Other than convenience for the Back of the Hill apartment complex people, which is nice, but hardly needs a Wikipedia article. Responses? --Lquilter (talk) 16:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
