Talk:BR Standard Class 4 2-6-0 76084
This article was nominated for deletion on 15 December 2015. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Independent references
[edit]Here are a few that I found on a quick search:
- https://books.google.com/books?id=E2za7qURasIC&pg=PA186&lpg=PA186&dq=locomotive+76084&source=bl&ots=rksFLqPb4Z&sig=LK6UutTPXxHpFaZgYCNUi8WURz4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjW_4zZ6uDJAhXLeD4KHSZvDO04HhDoAQhHMAk#v=onepage&q=locomotive%2076084&f=false
- https://books.google.com/books?id=Xa6OBAAAQBAJ&pg=PT142&lpg=PT142&dq=locomotive+76084&source=bl&ots=yg1DL-MNF-&sig=NIjjlexTOFlh5wIZVamPUNkGK7o&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi30uP-6uDJAhUIMz4KHVGAD-o4KBDoAQhMMAk#v=onepage&q=locomotive%2076084&f=false
- http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/10924969.Horwich_built_steam_locomotive_coming_home_after___650_000_restoration_project/?ref=rss
- http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/10326749.East_Lancashire_steam_train_on_track_to_return_after_50_years/?ref=rss
- http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/69592316/br4-mogul-76084-set-steam-year (references magazine article in Railways Illustrated)
- http://www.adelimited.co.uk/previous-projects/4588453424
- http://www.rail.co.uk/rail-news/2013/late-august-preserved-railway-steam-events-to-visit/
- http://www.gcrailway.co.uk/locomotives/76084-2/
- http://www.nnrailway.co.uk/steamlocos.php
I'm sure with more time I could find more... Slambo (Speak) 16:51, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Walford, John (2003). Taylor, R.K. (ed.). A Detailed History of British Railways Standard Steam Locomotives - Volume Two: The 4-6-0 and 2-6-0 Classes. Peterborough: RCTS. pp. 168–211. ISBN 0-901115-93-2. particularly p. 201 --Redrose64 (talk) 23:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Images
[edit]I do not think that anyone would disagree that what is required in the article are, the best available, most illustrative of the text, photographs. It is understandable the User: Moylesy98 prefers what they describe as "MY F*CKING IMAGES" but please User: Moylesy98 come to talk to discuss rather than edit war to include them. Meanwhile I will replace the images preferred by those other than the editor who wants their own images.SovalValtos (talk) 05:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)