Jump to content

Talk:BMW Z8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:BMW Z8 (E52))

Additions

[edit]

I've made many additions to this page, and we should continue to work towards making this an authoritative Z8 reference, but I feel the need to address two issues directly. The first is the Z8 and the Bond connection, and the second is the frame warp issue.

I'm changing the portion of the "Media" section that claims the Bond producers were "tired" of using BMWs. I don't want to delete somebody else's work without justification. The Z8 was selected for the last of three movies in which BMWs were contractually scheduled to appear. The return of Aston to the Bond films was another business decision. Almost every scene in "Die Another Day" is groaning with Ford products.

I've tried to treat the frame damage issue with sensitivity to BMW and owners who worry about the value of their cars. Since questions remain about the extent or even the existence of the problem, claims should be addressed as "allegations" and "reports." In deference to owners seeking redress, I think the BMW "performance package" needs to be treated with some skepticism until users confirm that the problem is solved. For that reason, I see the frame warp issue as open and ongong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim LM (talkcontribs) 18:49, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not arguing with what you've done, but if there's more information I don't think "sensitivity" and "deference to owners" are relevant concerns. If you have a reliable source with encyclopedic information, add it. atakdoug 02:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

11/03/2008

[edit]

I've removed the line "In 'Alex Rider: Operation Stormbreaker', the Z8 is used by Ian Rider (played by Ewan Mcgregor) to escape capture from Darius Syle's henchmen. He is also killed in the vehicle by Yasan Gregorovich."

The car in Stormbreaker was a Z4. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.103.233.1 (talk) 09:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Media (journalist) reviews

[edit]

Since I'm not in the habit of knowing all the ins and outs of editing here on Wikipedia, I'll just list what results I've found while searching through my automotive library of U.S. auto gearhead publications:

In the Criticism section...

Wind noise complaint: Car & Driver, April 2001 edition. "Aston Martin DB7 vs. BMW Z8, Ferrari 360 Spider"; article by Csabe Csere, Ray Hutton, Pete Robinson, Barry Winfield. From the article the reviwers cited that with the roof up, the Z8 was subject to wind noise that became prominent at 70 mph (even more restrictive--of a sort--than the 85 mph listed in the Wiki Z8 article). And with the top down, they claimed that the wind blocker design used by BMW was not effective at all, describing the resultant buffeting inherent with many convertible-topped cars as "gale-force backdrafts" in the Z8.

Seating position: didn't find much of anything from my library that addressed specific ergonomic qualms, but from the same C&D article above, the authors describe the seating position as "you seem to sit on this car, rather than in it", in reference to the relatively upright feel (presumably when compared to the two other cars of this road test article, if not other contemporary vehicles to the Z8 of the era). The authors implied that this was in large part due to the BMW's intentional retro lineage to its predecessor and inspiration, the 1950s-era BMW 507. One of the article's writers (Hutton) did indeed dislike the steering wheel, though not necessarily for the same reasons as the Wiki article seems to suggest, and didn't care much for the center-mounted gauges with the consequence of "the blank space where I want the rev counter and speedo to be", quoting from the article.

So...I guess I found one "professional" resource that appears to collaborate to a varying degree at least two of the criticisms cited in the Wikipedia article against the Z8. If there are more, others will have to sniff them out from other resources (Road & Track was quite complimentary in their May 2000 review of the Z8. I've already archived (dead storaged) my Automobile issues from that era so their review is not easily available to me any more. And as for Motor Trend...well, it's Motor Trend and it'll be a cold day in h-e-double toothpicks before I'll let a copy of THAT rag into my house, let alone my library). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monoblocks (talkcontribs) 14:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Returning?

[edit]

Is it true BMW is going to start offering this model again? Its design is supposed to be somewhat similar to the current Z4 Coupe. --71.237.182.222 (talk) 00:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. U1Quattro (talk) 07:34, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12/6/2011 edit

[edit]

Looked at the article. Found the picture stating "Alpina V8 roadster" this seems to be a typo so fixed to "Alpina Z8 roadster" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yskwiki (talkcontribs) 23:59, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Alpina was called the V8 Roadster so have changed back, and added references. Warren (talk) 16:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 June 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 21:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


BMW Z8 (E52)BMW Z8 – There was only one generation of the Z8, so it is currently at a needless disambguator. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:45, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BMW Z8. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image

[edit]

Common colour is not a good candidate for an image to be chosen. It just makes the car look bland in my opinion TKOIII. U1Quattro (talk) 06:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrofitted strut bar

[edit]

Isn't the issue of breaking front subframe worth mentioning? The strut-bar remedy came long after production launch. --87.147.190.99 (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

James Bond version

[edit]

Wasn’t there some models that were replicas of the one in the 007 movie?? I remember someone who bought one of the replicas at an auction for close to half a mil back in 2000. 97.101.23.45 (talk) 02:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article lead image

[edit]

I came across this image (File:Bmwz8.JPG) that used to be the lead image for this article and I wanted to know what others editors thought of it. Its lower resolution than the current image, but shows the car at a better angle, its cleaner, it has a less busy background, has no front license plate, and despite its low resolution it still looks pretty clear as a lead image in the infobox. TKOIII (talk) 19:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]