User talk:TKOIII

TKOIII, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TKOIII! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Covini Engineering, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Volkswagen Karmann Ghia into Volkswagen Type 3. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:38, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dino (automobile), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leonardo Fioravanti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TKOIII (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. I'm unsure why it thinks i'm a web host. TKOIII (talk) 15:55, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 15:55, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A page you started (Brabham BT62) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Brabham BT62, TKOIII!

Wikipedia editor Willsome429 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating the page. Much appreciated.

To reply, leave a comment on Willsome429's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 22:45, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

more citations needed tags

I've always thought they were very lazy tags. If you see a statement that needs a cite then tag it with cn. As it is I shall add one ref to each article so tagged and delete the tag Cheers Greglocock (talk) 23:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hi, thanks for your great edits at Aston Martin. After a long absence, I started editing again. Appreciate any help to improve the article! I'm more versed in the car business, less so in the cars themselves BsBsBs (talk) 08:14, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi comma man

There is no specific need for commas for four-digit numbers:

Grouping with commas
Left of the decimal point, five or more digits are grouped into threes separated by commas (e.g. 12,200, 255,200 km, 8,274,527th, 1⁄86,400).
Numbers with exactly four digits left of the decimal point may optionally be grouped (either 1,250 or 1250), provided that this is consistent within each article.

WP:DIGITS

Especially for German and Japanese cars, the manufacturers themselves do not use commas (perhaps in the US market), and so there is no need for them here. French and Germans use a space, the Portuguese use a period, the Japanese don't use anything. The English-speaking world does not have a universal style either. You will notice that the Manual of Style does not prefer one over the other. They even allow for numbering with spaces: 1234567.5555 Thanks for your time, Mr.choppers | ✎ 02:01, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Picture licensing

Hello and thank you for your contributions. I want to upload some photos with the consent of their respective authors but the problem is that the authors are unaware about the CC licensing. How should I upload the photos in this situation? U1Quattro (talk) 17:50, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not an expert on the topic but my advice is, if possible, have the author publish the image to either Wikimedia commons directly, or to Flickr under the appropriate license (CC-BY or CC-BY-SA both work) and then upload it to Wikimedia. TKOIII (talk) 01:26, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here’s some more detailed information on uploading images: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Uploading_images (General guide to uploading) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr (Uploading from Flickr to Wikimedia) TKOIII (talk) 01:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will ask them to upload those images on Flickr since they don't have a commons account. U1Quattro (talk) 05:11, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TKOIII. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alpine A110-50, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sequential transmission (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whitespace stripping

Please don't make edits like this.

They are, first of all, useless. They have no visible change to the article. CITEVAR et al. are against such changes. Mostly though, stripping whitespace from complex templates makes editing more difficult for editors in the future. Why do this? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:53, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think I see what you're talking about. Sorry, I don't believe I meant to do that. That edit was just supposed to be a change in the main caption, though the edit summary shows it as a condensation of the whole infobox, not sure what triggered that. I will try to be cognizant of that in the future. --TKOIII (talk) 14:38, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TKOIII, same thing here - the white spaces make life much much easier for editors. Is this a bot thing? Thanks! Mr.choppers | ✎ 20:24, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, sorry about that. I definitely didn't strip that whitespace intentionally. It had to have been something to do with my computer or Wikipedia. The only changes I intentionally made were adding a 19 to the beginning of those 2 years, converting the weight and adding a space in the middle of roof lining. All that other editing it's showing was done automatically somehow. Not sure how or why, any idea what could be causing that? TKOIII (talk) 23:31, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beta Technologies Logo.svg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Automobiles with hidden headlamps has been nominated for discussion

Category:Automobiles with hidden headlamps, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Vossanova ^o< 14:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Units

Hello, if you use convert template, pls dont add conversion to units which are used 1st time in prose, they are left intentionally to that, because its said so in wikipedia manual of style. -->Typ932 ^T·C 18:06, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@typ932 What do you mean? Prose as in written out/not abbreviated OR prose as in written out in plain text instead of the convert template?TKOIII (talk) 21:08, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Toyota concept cars

Thank you for your hard work tidying up the various car show articles and links going into them. Just thought that you should know that almost every Toyota concept has a link of its own. Ie: you can link to Toyota DMT instead of Toyota concept vehicles (2000–2009)#DMT. If you find any missing then let me know and I will fix it. Thanks. Stepho talk 12:21, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for telling me! That should save me a ton of time making these edits. I did notice while editing that one of the articles had a dedicated redirect but I wasn't sure if that was universal and didn't really check but i'll definitely make sure to use those in the future. TKOIII (talk) 17:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subcat

I noticed that you remove parent categories, only for people to add them back in. Most people don't understand WP:SUBCAT, so it would be helpful to put a hidden comment in like  to discourage people from adding them back in. Stepho talk 21:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peugeot 404

Hi TKOIII - you added a lovely picture of a 404 coupé as the lead image on the Peugeot 404 page. Although I personally like the picture very much, I don't think this image is what would come to mind, if you were to ask the average reader what a Peugeot 404 looks like. Could you please consider changing it back to a sedan picture? there are plenty of them on the Commons, such as this one.

Wikiwayman (talk) 13:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sure. That's a fair point. I'll definitely keep the coupe image in the article in some capacity though as its a great pic TKOIII (talk) 19:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, keep up the good work. Wikiwayman (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cadillac CTS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sedan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ford Fiesta

Hi TKO, Not sure if you're aware but the first Fiesta was manufactured/built in 1976 so therefore this edit would be correct?, Many thanks, Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 21:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Davey, I reverted that edit because the category "1970s cars" is the parent category to "Cars introduced in 1976" and is thus redundant to have both according to WP:Subcat. I've been doing copy edits removing these categories for a while where they're not neccessary. The user who made that edit has actually been banned on here 4 times or so on different accounts for edit warring, profane language towards other users and general disruption. His edits always revolve around reverting the copy edits I have been doing so I was going through and reverting his latest round of edits. Hope that makes more sense. TKOIII (talk) 22:10, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TKO, Ah my apologies I'd completely missed the "Cars introduced in 1976" category, Thank you for your informative reply - If I spot them before you I'll obviously revert them, Thanks again, Take care and stay safe. Kind Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 22:20, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you too. And next time i'll try to remember to add edit summaries when I revert them so it'll be clearer, I usually do but this time it seems I forgot. TKOIII (talk) 22:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

what a load of complete and utter nonsense, why the hell would you remove that category when it was obviously sold in that decade, it does not make sense, it's perfectly acceptable and valid to include it, whoever made those rules needs their head checked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.217.39.34 (talk) 20:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh so you finally found my talk page. Took longer than I expected TKOIII (talk) 20:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking logically is hard. Listening is even harder, apparently. Mr.choppers | ✎ 15:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merkur Scorpio

Not sure if there are any eyes on the talkpage over there, so a question for you here: Do you think that we need a pic of a European Scorpio/Granada on the page? One was there and I folded it into the gallery, but I have a half a mind to just delete it. Any opinion? Mr.choppers | ✎ 01:47, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any reason not to have it honestly. In my eyes it's interesting to see them side by side and it contributes to the article by showing the reader visually the relationship between the two cars. TKOIII (talk) 20:16, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good, then it stays. By the way, just wanted to state that your picture changes are nearly always for the better - those of us who upload a lot of our own photos are often a bit blinkered and may have a hard time identifying the best photos. Cheers, Mr.choppers | ✎ 02:15, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate it. I figured images are the first things people see when they click on an article so why not make sure they're as good as they can be. TKOIII (talk) 03:33, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioned at ANI

Hi TKO, Just a heads up I've mentioned the above discussion/IP at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#IP_rangeblock so you may want to chip in as you have more knowledge with this guy than I do, Many thanks, Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 19:18, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, yeah I do have a good bit of information saved on them but I can't find the discussion on the page you linked, what's the section name? TKOIII (talk) 01:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1039#IP rangeblock, but it seems to have been dealt with already. Mr.choppers | ✎ 01:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I'd forgot I asked you so archived it once it was dealt with, I've unarchived it so hopefully you'll find it at the above lonk, Apologies again, Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 11:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jaguar XKSS at Petersen Museum

I removed that sentence because the editor that added it has an obvious COI with the Petersen Museum (not going to post details here, but it's easily Google-able). 100% of that editor's contributions have been to promote the Petersen Museum. If you or another neutral/unbiased editor wants to re-add the content, I'm totally fine with that. Thanks! drt1245 (talk) 20:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I see what you mean. It could be a fan or an employee but either way I do see how it smells of self promo. TKOIII (talk) 21:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An Aston Martin DBS Superleggera for you!


	For making significant improvements to Ruf RK. Keep up the good work!U¹ _quattro TALK 14:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ruf RTR

Hello TKOIII. Can you find a source about the end of production fo the RTR? As far as I'm aware, the RTR was based on the post facelift 991.2 since 2018 and the web seems vague about whether it is discontinued or still being made. U¹ _quattro TALK 13:01, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look. I believe according to Ruf they say its a past model (so its been discontinued) but they don't give a start or end date to production. TKOIII (talk) 22:42, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Convert

I apologize beforehand if you already knew this one, but my favorite conversion trick is this:

Which gives this: 74 kW (100 PS; 99 hp)

Rather than this: 74 kW (101 PS; 99 hp)

I find this very useful for German youngtimers especially, since they always stated kilowatts as the primary unit but were clearly converting from PS. Best, Mr.choppers | ✎ 02:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About the McLaren F1

Why can’t you understand that the McLaren P1 is the real successor to the McLaren F1? Big Drake 305 (talk) 16:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see you posted on the F1 talk page, that's a good first step, much better than edit warring like you were doing and then got blocked for. However, if you really want to make a case that the P1 was the successor the F1 you'll need to provide reasoning and reliable sources to back up your claim. TKOIII (talk) 19:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How is the McLaren GT a grand tourer and the Corvette not?

No disrespect folk. You can literally do research on cargo space. Their interior is literally the same type. Ride quality, exactly the same. They differ from other sports car in many ways. Just because a manufacturer [does/doesn't] state its cars' classes doesn't mean there isn't a need of mention.

The AMG GT and Nissan GT-R are FAR FROM grand tourers yet no source was put in regards to those cars 66.215.90.113 (talk) 05:40, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make a note that while McLaren calls the GT a grand tourer that many automotive publications disagreed with that classification then go ahead but back it up with sources from said publications and that's something you should probably include in the main text. Not sure what should be put in the class section honestly, maybe put it out as a question on the talk page and see what everyone else thinks. TKOIII (talk) 07:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beta Technologies Logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beta Technologies Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox images

Hello, please do not 'force' infobox images. The image should be written as just the filename I.e. "xxxxxxxx.jpg" or whatever file type it may be; no brackets or 'thumb' etc. Please see WP:IBI for more information. This style of formatting applies to the great majority of infoboxes now. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 20:46, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my bad. I saw that it was being used in most of the existing F1 infoboxes so I figured it was accepted. Is there another way to modify the size of an infobox image other than forcing images? Because otherwise the images in the F1 infoboxes appear much smaller than in standard production car infoboxes. TKOIII (talk) 22:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TBH I think it's a bit of a confused area. I agree some images do appear smaller than others may do but as I understand it, it *can* depend on individual settings etc. I do recall having lengthy discussions with an experienced editor about this kind of thing; some years ago now though. As a result of that I used the frameless and upright params in some instances (which often provided a slightly fuller rendering) until I discovered that was not SOP. Some infobox templates even have the 'hidden' advice not to use full parameters ('file' and so on). I believe the default setting is 220px and some pages do have the image size parameter set to a higher figure, but it is my observation that it gets removed sooner or later. None of this helps very much I'm afraid. Eagleash (talk) 23:10, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

VW Golf (2005) Transmission.

I want to ask about "hidrolic brain" of this transmission system. What kind of problem can we see cause of this piece? And can we buy this piece on market ? (or second hand) Also VW company service says " You dont need to change oil of this transmission. Its lifetime material." Is it true for you or are you recommend to change oil some periods? Gulsariyorga (talk) 13:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check your request for verification

Hello TKOIII! Rightfully you made this[1] request for verfication. Pls check your estimation again after this improvements have been made in the last 3 years. Also have a look at the talkpage of the artile. Best --Ｔｏｍ (talk) 09:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MG MGB, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roadster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help

I will remove the pony/muscle classifications from the other American pages 2600:1012:B0E3:2F3:F985:6AE9:A1FC:704D (talk) 05:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would hold off on doing that for now, I need to reread the discussion around car classification in the wikiproject auto guidelines and double check if pony car and muscle car have been discussed before. And if not i'll probably start a discussion about them. TKOIII (talk) 05:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Microsport

Yay, I saw you edited a Bertone article not too long ago and then your page led me to WikiProject Automobiles, thank you! I'm going to post in the talk page there, at my wits end about Ghia Microsport notability, which was at the same auction, interested in taking a look at it and improving it? Thanks! Chadnibal (talk) 22:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, TKOIII. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.DR187 (talk) 06:42, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TKOIII. Thank you for your work on Antem. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Colt/FYI

I saw this edit and I agree - but be aware that the Delica was sold as the Mitsubishi Colt L300 in Indonesia for many decades and is often called simply "Mitsubishi Colt" there (and in the Philippines). They also call the large Fuso trucks "Mitsubishi Colt Diesel", to make things more confusing still. But I still lean towards that making the hatnote appropriate in Indonesian-language Wiki, not necessarily here. Best, Mr.choppers | ✎ 13:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, that makes a lot more sense as to why they put that. I agree, that hatnote would be more appropriate on the Indonesian language article. TKOIII (talk) 20:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Custom car

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Custom car, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Bugatti Chiron successor information

Hey why do you remove information about the Bugatti Chiron's successor? The car is already confirmed to debut on June 20, so I'm putting it back up, whether you like it or not. GylonVisagie (talk) 14:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Automobiles/Conventions#Unannounced vehicles states "information about future or speculative vehicles that have not been officially announced by their manufacturer should not be discussed". In this case, Bugatti has only announced that they are *going to* announce a new hypercar. I don't think that this qualifies for the guidelines, but i'm open to having other editors weigh in or having someone show me precedent that states otherwise as I could be wrong. TKOIII (talk) 15:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTALBALL also encourages us to wait until we have facts rather than educated guesses. WP reports verifiable facts. Stepho talk 12:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TKOIII. Thank you for your work on Carrozzeria Pavesi. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article. I really enjoyed learning about this Italian coachbuilding company.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 08:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviving discussion at Template:Infobox automobile

I hope you don't mind, but I revived a discussion on spiritual predecessors/successors that you started last year at Template talk:Infobox automobile. Unfortunately, your topic received no responses at that time. I agree that the subject needs to be addressed specifically in the template instructions. I'm hoping others will weigh in this time. Best, Bahooka (talk) 14:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate you reviving the discussion as that's still a big unresolved question I would love some consensus on, especially since there's frequently conflicts between editors about it. TKOIII (talk) 17:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TKOIII. Thank you for your work on Carrosserie Beutler. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]