Talk:Awaara

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Sorry Sunil

Sunil, I didn't think your edits were an improvement on the synopsis that we had, so I reverted them. I don't want to discourage you ... we need all the help we can get here. But it might be better if you worked on providing synopses for some of the other films that don't have any; then other people can copyedit your English. There are thousands of good Bollywood films with no entries and no synopses, so the field is wide open! Zora 07:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 17:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

title

Why does the article title have 2 A's between the W and R, when the poster has only one? I also have a DVD that shows it with only 1 A. BollyJeff || talk 19:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Importance rating

Shouldn't it be at least mid-importance? It's one of the classic films and all, if you know what I mean. Fireblazex3 (talk) 13:48, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 December 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as currently laid out. Film Fan, in future, please don't alter your proposals like this – it means to understand what everyone has said the closer needs to go digging through the page history. Jenks24 (talk) 05:05, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Awara (1951 film) → Awaara (1951 film)
Awara Hoon → Awaara Hoon

– In the English-speak world (WP:NCF), Awāra becomes Awaara.[1] You can spell it with the accent or with the double "A", but not a single "A" without the accent. Same reason Baahubali: The Beginning is titled that way, among others. The 2012 film is actually called Awara, and has to be disambiguated from other uses. WP:COMMONNAME also supports these three moves. Film Fan 00:46, 12 December 2015 (UTC)--Relisted. Tiggerjay (talk) 00:19, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've now updated the proposal (fixed 1st, removed 3rd) to reflect early consensus, 70.51.44.60, In ictu oculi, Lugnuts. Film Fan 11:20, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose "2012" move; I oppose moving the 2012 film. "Awāra" is transcropted a number of ways, one of them includes "Awara" by simple stripping of diacritics, so the 2012 film should not be moved. There are also multiple films listed at the disambiguation page Awara -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:04, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as proposed "1951" move; I think Awaara should redirect to the disambiguation page, so if the film is moved it should go to Awaara (1951 film) -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:10, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose first and third move. As a variant Awaara should redirect to the Awara disambiguation page. If the 1951 film is moved it should go to Awaara (1951 film), the 2012 film should stay put. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:42, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No particular opinion on the song, it is transcribed both ways in Google Books I would have thought आवारा हूँ should be Aavaara huun. Which Hindi romanization system does en.wp favour? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:52, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose First + third per In ictu oculi. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:12, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Relisting to receive consensus regarding revised request. Film Fan updated the proposal at 11:20, 12 December 2015 (UTC) and since then there has been no specific discussion. Tiggerjay (talk) 00:19, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Awaara (1951 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120530081220/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com:80/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Raj-Kapoors-Awaara-in-Times-100-greatest-films/articleshow/13593518.cms to http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Raj-Kapoors-Awaara-in-Times-100-greatest-films/articleshow/13593518.cms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:01, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Awaara (1951 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:57, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]