Talk:Automated driving system

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles

Technology

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Automobiles

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles

Untitled

Reliable

Arie P. van den Beaukel Mascha C. Van der Voort, et al “How to assess driver's interaction with partially automated driving systems – A framework for early concept assessment” Applied Ergonomics Volume 59 Part A Pg. 302-312. 10.19.16.

Denaro, Robert P., et al. "Automated Vehicle Technology." King Coal Highway292 (2014): 19.

Proposed Changes

In the article my partner Andrew and I are going to work on updated the look, facts, and examples in the article. In doing so we hope to use the new technology such as the Uber self-driving car, as well as the Tesla products to update examples that the article shows. Secondly, we are going to update the look of the page by adding up to date pictures. The picture that is displayed is not exactly a picture that we would use to show what it is. Possibly a self-driving car would be a better more up to date example. By adding some more sources will also make a difference in the way the page is set up. I feel as if by adding one or two more sources it creates more opportunities to be fact checked and be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charvey1597 (talk • contribs) 16:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 May 2020 and 4 August 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tiffany Ong, Dkoodev, Midllaoi, SteveHornyak34.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General edits

The article seems like a great introduction to the system that it discusses. I’m impressed by how well thought out the introduction is. However, I think that the article lacks a cohesive order. It feels as though the entire article is an introduction, despite the fact that the information provided goes into much more detail than an introduction would. By adding more subsections, you could provide more order to the information being explained. For example, the “full automation” section in bold could either link to an article on full automation, or be a subsection of its own.

The article is titled Automated Driving System but it seems to relate specifically to the car as no other types of vehicles are mentioned in the post. I commend you for starting your own article page but believe most of your content is already available @ https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Autonomous_car where advantages/disadvantages, policy, ethics, and tesla are discussed. If your article is meant to be separate from this other one I think there needs to be a more clear differentiation in the content. If you keep your article a stand-alone, I would suggest linking it to the page above and below.

Also see: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Vehicular_automation for automation in more vehicle types.

I also think the very first sentence of the article could be written better and a more appropriate quote could be found. In my opinion the stem word “drive” is used too much. It seems repetitive and jumbled. Try not to use the words you are defining in the definition.

“An automated driving system "is a driving system of automobiles that can be defined as systems where perception, decision making, and operation by a human driver while driving an automobile are performed by electronics and machinery instead of a human driver, and as introduction of automation into road traffic."

“Automated driving systems are currently under development, and self-driving cars may soon...”

Aren’t some self-driving cars already available to the public? I’m not positive but maybe double check. Do Tesla cars not count and self driving?

These are our three suggestions: 1. Break the article into more sections, to give it more order. Most likely through the use of subsections 2. Consider your core article focus Is it too similar to pre-existing articles? 3. Make sure your information is specific to the article, and not just introductory.

Schroffb (talk) 03:24, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]