Talk:Autolux

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Corrections

I deleted reference to Autolux being indie rock. They aren't. Indie refers to "independent". Autolux is not on an independent label. They are on Epic/Sony.
Whoever added the Track "Listening" seems to have just made up things. I corrected song titles and times.
Inserted ages are wrong. corrected to as close as possible based on new york times article that states ages from a year and a half ago.
Changed formation date back to 1999, based a number of online interviews that give that year as formation date.
I would hesitate to call Autolux shoegaze. The band frowns on such a classification as well.

Constant reverts by 76.173.108.150

Someone at the IP address of 76.173.108.150 keeps reverting my edits on this page, specifically deleting any {{Fact}} tags as well as deleting a mention of Garbage. The latter is mentioned in a cited sentence stating bands with which Autolux has been compared to, including Garbage. Since it follows quite logically to mention bands Autolux has been compared to directly from the source material that the statement is being cited from in the first place, I fail to see the point of consistently reverting such edits. So, in the hope of avoiding a very trivial editing war, please discuss the matter further here. I will add the mention of Garbage back if there's no further discussion, as well as revert the {{Fact}} tags immediately, in hopes of pointing out where the article can be improved. Drewcifer3000 05:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment

I do not know much about the band, but I rate articles for the WPMusicians project. I gave the Start-class and Low-priority ratings on May 7 2007. I see that there are some added references in the article, but that not much content has changed since my previous rating, which is why I was surprised to see it in the unrated category again. Normally, an editor whom would want reassessment would ask for a Peer review from the WPBiography project. This article states a bit about what the band has actually done, but does not talk about the band in other ways. It would be good to include more information about the members and how they relate to one another. As a reader, I would be interested to know more about their music. Are there descriptions of it other than rock or eclectic? What is the atmosphere of their concerts? When Goresther and Azar met scoring the play, what version of it was it, or where was that version performed? Is most of their fanbase from Los Angeles? Do the members of the band hold any public political views? I guess some of this information might be considered POV, but it would give readers a better understanding of the band besides the facts of when, where, and with whom they performed and recorded. - cgilbert^{(talk|contribs)} 01:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I'll see what I can do. Drewcifer3000 04:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Autolux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thelisten.net/coachella/files/thelisten-coachella2005-schedule_bw.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070711211821/http://upcoming.yahoo.com:80/venue/10162/?show=past-only to http://upcoming.yahoo.com/venue/10162/?show=past-only
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.prefixblog.com/prefixmag_blog/2006/01/autolux_on_jimm.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927194651/http://angryape.com/news/2007/05/unkle-remix-autolux-for-new-single to http://angryape.com/news/2007/05/unkle-remix-autolux-for-new-single

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Autolux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]