Talk:Autogenerative high-pressure digestion

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 29 July 2024 by reviewer ToadetteEdit (talk · contribs).

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: This article needs considerable rewriting to demonstrate notability, versus being merged into the larger article Anaerobic digestion. To @Mgp28:, please do not remove tags without substantially improving the article and justifying it's independence on the talk page.

Ldm1954 (talk) 00:26, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ldm1954, Sorry about that. When I looked through the article's references I felt that they were sufficient to show that the subject was notable. I had thought that the work to show this had been done by others since the tags were added and that they were no longer needed. Mgp28 (talk) 00:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should I mark it as unreviewed? Mgp28 (talk) 00:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want a third opinion, then mark it as unreviewed. Otherwise it is up to the original editor @Muziekliefhebber1983: and others who have contributed such as @Glennznl and Reba16: to repair the article with proper sourcing and secondary sources, WP:PROVEIT. And change it from an essay to an encyclopedic article, plus demonstrate independent notability. Otherwise it is a candidate for merging into Anaerobic digestion, since it looks to me like it is just a variant. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After re-reading it a few times I was going to mark as unreviewed, but I've noticed that you have marked it as reviewed so I'm happy to leave it like that for your plan as above. Thanks, Mgp28 (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]