Talk:Astrobotic Technology

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Robotics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Google Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Astronomy: Moon / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Moon task force.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force.

Edit summary

I don't think that Andrevan's edit was harmful. Truly. That's why I assumed good faith.

However, I do think that I don't know why it was changed. That's what the edit summary is for. The edit can simply be redone and a short note on who, what, and why should be included. E_dog95'^{Hi '} 18:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't leave one because it was obvious what I was doing, and no further exposition seemed necessary.Andre (talk) 19:56, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the sake of clarification: This edit was made due to the article being corrected to agree with the reference. Andre (talk) 19:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It took you more than an hour to finally say what you're intentions were with that simple edit. During that hour, you accused me of vandalism, threatened me with blocking, and generally showed poor conduct when collaborating with others. I do not respect your ways, nor your ability as an editor on this collaboration-based encyclopedia. We should not have to research the who's and what's of your edits simply because you weren't nice enough to leave a summary. E_dog95'^{Hi '} 20:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed reference to Raytheon and University of Arizona because Astrobotic has not been affiliated with them for a couple years. Updated description with current affiliations to come. Authenticus (talk) 17:39, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Instead, you should change that part to the past tense and cite the fact that they are no longer involved. Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia of the present truth but of change over time. Andrevan@ 00:28, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More press on the SpaceX launch contract signing for the moon launch

More press I haven't yet had time to read. May be helpful for improving the article.

Cheers. N2e (talk) 14:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...and another, one week on. N2e (talk) 00:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.spacenews.com/venture_space/110214-astrobotic-books-falcon9.html
http://www.dminuszero.com/blog/astrobotic-technology-inc.html (from the company blog)

A few details on the lander

There are a number of details on the design and current manufacturing status of the lander in the slide show text that accompanies the Wall Street Journal article of 2 July 2011. I added a citation to the WSJ source to the main AT article yesterday. Cheers. N2e (talk) 13:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date for the mission announced: Oct 2015

This press release gives the date for the mission as late October 2015, 2 1/2 years from now, with launch on a SpaceX Falcon 9. Landing location is planned for the lunar north pole: the mission "will prospect for potentially rich deposits of water ice, methane and other resources at the moon’s north pole." Cheers. N2e (talk) 03:14, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More press, an article in Scientific American was published 3 Apr 2012, Entrepreneurs Race to Get a Rover on the Moon and Win $30 Million. N2e (talk) 04:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Astrobotic Technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Copyedit (minor)

Thank you fellow editors for documenting that Wikipedia went to the Moon. Geraldshields11 (talk) 12:53, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Luna Grid

the company is touting this solution and plans to deploy it as a payload in 2026. should be added as a section in the article if its a product they offer https://www.astrobotic.com/lunar-delivery/lunar-surface-power/ 73.210.30.217 (talk) 06:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]