Talk:Asperitas (cloud)
This article was nominated for deletion on 7 March 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
A fact from Asperitas (cloud) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 June 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
CGI?
[edit]"to CGI effects used in movies such as Ghostbusters." Ghostbusters was made in 1984, I don't think it had any CGI. Algr (talk) 07:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
The name of this entry is wrong
[edit]Undulus asperatus → Undulatus Asperatus — There is no such cloud term as 'undulus'. It should be 'undulatus'. The author must have picked up this misspelling from an error in an article on the National Geographic website. That error has now been corrected ([1]) to say the correct term 'undulatus asperatus'.
- I've moved the page as requested, per sources. Good thing, too, because Wikipedia mirrors were already inflating g-hits for the wrong spelling... -GTBacchus(talk) 15:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Rarity
[edit]The article has two confusing statements about rarity:
- "Undulatus asperatus (or alternately, asperatus) is a rare, newly recognized cloud formation ..."
and later:
- "The ominous-looking clouds have been particularly common in the Plains states of the United States"
Which of these is true? -Miskaton (talk) 21:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
References
[edit]All the references of this article have copyright, and wikipedia only accept information under GPL. Please, Respect the copyright rules :) --88.7.114.166 (talk) 15:31, 14 December 2009 (UTC)