Talk:Askeaton GAA

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gaelic games Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gaelic games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gaelic games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gaelic gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Gaelic gamesTemplate:WikiProject Gaelic gamesGaelic games
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <it is in the same category as 18 other Limerick GAA clubs and in my opinion it has relevant information and is well referenced>. — Iverus (talk) 00:14, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article has multiple issues (see the template on the Article Page). On Wikipedia, sometimes less is more. RashersTierney (talk) 01:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <there are hundreds of articles on GAA clubs of similar, but no greater significance. This issue has been raised before on similar grounds.. Wikipedia:WikiProject Gaelic games should be able to elaborate>. — RashersTierney (talk) 00:50, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because there are not only hudnreds of articles on simaler gaa clubs, but there is a lot of information and plenty of sources. It is a usefull article and should not be deleted.P0PP4B34R732 (talk) 01:09, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]