Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gaelic games

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Good article reassessment for Enda Muldoon

[edit]

Enda Muldoon has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed.

[edit]

I am about to loose my cool with the edits of an editor. In this case, it are the edits of Budisgood. His GAA edits usually lacks sources and are often of poor quality/relevance. Especially the lack of quality and relevance is an issue for me. Examples of his problematic edits (not only GAA-related): Arles county laois, not-so-short short description on Tinnahinch GAA and adding GAA-clubs as formal part of a Roman-Catholic parish. Discussions and warnings proved fruitless so far. Anybody has ideas how improvements in the edits of Budisgood can be achieved? The Banner talk 04:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Solved, as the editor is blocked indefinitely. The Banner talk 15:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Cú Chulainn

[edit]

Cú Chulainn has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GAA Centenary Article

[edit]

Create Centenary of the Gaelic Athletic Association to a standard at least that of Centenary of the Easter Rising. Add to Template:Gaelic Athletic Association.

Notice

The article Glasgow Caledonian University GAC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved over 15 years. No reliable sources online Google. Not enough information to merge. Redirect would be redundant. Article created in 2009.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]