Jump to content

Talk:Aromal Chekavar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 22 February 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moving, uncontroversial per the sources previously presented in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aromal Chekaver. Dekimasuよ! 23:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Aromal ChekaverAromal Chekavar – wrong spelling Teaminc (talk) 22:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The actual spelling is Aromal Chekavar and also it is pronounced like that.Teaminc (talk) 23:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

New page create

[edit]

I will try to expand this page by overcoming redirection.J.k.r0012 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 05:11, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

[edit]

Puthariyankam section is completely plagiarized from Kerala History and its Makers page 84, page 85, will make changes as needed Drew Stanley (talk) 17:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

done Drew Stanley (talk) 17:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Aromal Chekavar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Drew Stanley (talk · contribs) 17:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 08:21, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a quickfail. The page at 300 words is not likely to meet Good Article criterion 3a, that the article "addresses the main aspects of the topic". Consider expanding the page to meet the broadness criterion. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 08:21, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.