Jump to content

Talk:Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:ArkhamAsylum-002.jpg

[edit]

Image:ArkhamAsylum-002.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox needed

[edit]

This article could use an infobox. And some basic information, like when it was published. RobertM525 (talk) 20:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Mad Hatter

[edit]

The section on the Mad Hatter states that subsequent writers have adopted in some fashion the pedophilia of the character from this story. However, the article on the Mad Hatter claims the opposite. Which is true, and can we get some citations? 75.175.5.142 (talk) 07:34, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

[edit]

The whole plot section needs a rewrite from the ground up. And also a mention of how Batman -also- fared in the fight against Croc, I think that part is very noteable. Lots42 (talk) 05:23, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't that spear wind up driven all the way through Batman's torso? That was one of the moments that yanked me out of the story, because that's likely a fatal wound, and nothing was done about it. I don't re-read the book often, so I'm asking instead of checking.
--Ben Culture (talk) 12:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Media Adaptations - Film

[edit]

You only have The Dark Knight listed. It was referenced a lot more in Batman Begins, the Scarecrow RAN Arkham Asylum and had people declared mentally unfit to stand trial and committed to Arkham Asylum. There are scenes inside Arkham Asylum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.214.250.194 (talk) 12:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I kinda think the whole "In Other Media" section, as it is, could be axed entirely. None of the connections seem all that notable to me.
--Ben Culture (talk) 12:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible OR for the phrase "the Mother's Son"

[edit]

Article quotes writer Grant Morrison -

the story is woven tightly around a small number of symbolic elements, which combine and recombine throughout, as if in a dream: the Moon, the Shadow, the Mirror, the Tower, and the Mother's Son.

Most of these symbols are linked to the corresponding card of Tarot, but "the Mother's Son" is linked to Psycho (film). Is this original research (WP:OR)? Do we have a reliable third-party source (WP:SOURCE) for this reference?

-- 186.221.161.29 (talk) 23:49, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Batman's self-harm

[edit]

I think it would help convey the nature of this story if Batman's moment of self-harm is noted. Without finding and re-reading my copy of the book, I do remember him taking a shard of glass and driving it all the way through his hand. It wasn't subtle. I think it was a pretty significant part of the book's re-characterization of Batman (something a traditional Batman would never, EVER do), and illustrated how far he had been driven to "the breaking point", which the article currently only alludes to briefly.

I've just done a number of minor clean-up edits, but I don't feel up to adding content without any consensus. I'll leave it to others, but I would add that it doesn't necessarily need to be a separate, tacked-on paragraph, an "item". It should fit into the plot description naturally enough. Or not, I'm not sure.

This is quite a good article, about a book I don't consider to be all that great.

--Ben Culture (talk) 12:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Arkham Asylum: An Expensive Shrink-Wrapped First-Edition Hardback Graphic Novel"

[edit]

I wasn't THE biggest comics geek in 1988 or '89, but I remember being aware of this graphic novel before its release. I'd seen a sample of the artwork (The Joker's big face reveal), and I was dying to have it. After its release, I remember haunting comics shops, wishing there was an unwrapped copy I could peruse, or that I could get away with unwrapping one there in the bookstore (as I frequently do now), or that I had the nerve to just shell out $25 for a copy, unseen (which I eventually did). But they were selling that first-edition hardback strictly shrink-wrapped, back then. It's not-uncommon practice now, but I don't remembering it happening before.

Was this the first superhero graphic novel to be sold shrink-wrapped? I imagine it probably wasn't the first hardback. But am I on to something notable for the article, here?

--Ben Culture (talk) 12:16, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to numerous uncited passages including several paragraphs in "Collected editions". Is anyone willing to address these concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Arkham_Asylum:_A_Serious_House_on_Serious_Earth&oldid=1258077366"