User talk:RobertM525

Welcome!

Hello RobertM525, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fawcett5 12:54, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Printing press

Thanks for your work in removing the graffiti on this page. It might be worth having a look at this page: Wikipedia:Vandalism if you want to do this, especially the advice on how to revert a page is useful. --DannyWilde 09:33, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks for the info! Especially on the revert thing. That's much simpler than finding it and erasing it. :) RobertM525 06:30, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

EB1911

Hi, your right, it is a problem not only with EB1911 (the poster child) but a lot of other older works (see all the articles that draw from the Jewish Encyclopedia from 1906 for example). I added a section to the "Origins of the bias" in Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias about EB1911. And with the Project Gutenberg project to transfer the entire EB1911 online (see Encyclopedia Britannica Eleventh Edition) there is good justification to keep Wikipedia and EB1911 separate (at least verbatum copy). If you want to help reduce some of it, take a look at the edits for user Pwqn -- I reverted his edits back to about September or so, but there's a lot more that needs to be done. And that's just one case of mass text transfer. Anyway, I see your in school your probably better off focusing your time there in the big picture than chasing EB1911 vandals.-- Stbalbach 15:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. Yeah, while I support your quest, I can't actively take much of a part in it myself. :) Working full-time + going to college = no free time. Well, okay, add World of Warcraft in there, and Wikipedia's reduced to a hobby. :) RobertM525 05:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rogue (World of Warcraft)

Thank you. ^^ Havok (T/C/c) 12:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to be doing all the classes as soon as I have the time for it. They are all in need of clean up. People should start understanding that WP isn't WoW Wiki. :) Havok (T/C/c) 06:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:WoW-Imp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WoW-Imp.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:WoW-Succubus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WoW-Succubus.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WoWBloodElfNPCs.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:WoWBloodElfNPCs.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 00:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:World_of_Warcraft_Human_Male_Paladin.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:World_of_Warcraft_Human_Male_Paladin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WoW Rogue - Night elf male - Shadowcraft set.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WoW Rogue - Night elf male - Shadowcraft set.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WoW Warrior - Human male - Dreadnaught armor - 1H+S.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WoW Warrior - Human male - Dreadnaught armor - 1H+S.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Priest - UD-F - Prophecy + Anathema-wikipedia.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Priest - UD-F - Prophecy + Anathema-wikipedia.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Races in Warcraft

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Races in Warcraft, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Races in Warcraft is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Races in Warcraft, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 15:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:World of Warcraft Human Male Paladin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:World of Warcraft Human Male Paladin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for the information. Arm (talk) 13:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shaw's "Black girl in search of God"

Robert:

What sort of additional references do you have in mind?
What requires verification?
The article is linked to the George Bernard Shaw bio. What other link is needed?

Wugo (talk) 02:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shaw specifies that biblical statement, "Seek and you shall find." as the basis for his story. Are you saying the reference to the source should be removed? You can read the story, if you wish, at http://www.wikilivres.info/wiki/The_Black_Girl_in_Search_of_God

Wugo (talk) 03:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is absurd. The biblical citation is solely for the convenience of the readers. You may edit it out if you think it is objectionable. What other references, verifications and links do you suggest? Wugo (talk) 14:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your suggestions may very well be valid. Can you implement them? I am rather busy at the moment. Wugo (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sozzza babe.

I believe the changes I made to the 'jaundice' page were quite constructive. But hey, WHATEVS TREVS.

love ya long time robertm525 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.34.150 (talk) 10:57, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evangelical Church in Germany

I tried to answer your questions on the talk page. Ltwin (talk) 20:42, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. When you recently edited Pringlea antiscorbutica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A vote for consensus on Lead in main article

You have been a contributor to this article and so I am notifying you that a vote for consensus is currently ocurring on the main Hundred Years War article Talk Page. Would you please look here and vote as you see fit? Thanks. Mugginsx (talk) 14:49, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wonder Woman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Finch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RobertM525. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RobertM525. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RobertM525. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sourced content

Do not remove cited content from articles, as you did at Freddy vs. Jason. Dark Knight 2149 20:03, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's wrong. Freddy and Jason aren't in that game. Cited or not, the information is wrong. Freddy is in MK9 and Jason is in MX10. RobertM525 (talk) 23:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Except, yes they are. They are both playable in the mobile version of the game. And yes, Freddy Krueger was also in MK9. You should read our policies on verifiability and citing sources. Dark Knight 2149 00:46, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article said nothing about the mobile version and, IMO, it's useless trivia anyway. (Worth mentioning on each character's page but not on the page for that specific movie.) But, ya know what, you seem to have some kind of strong connection to that article, so you do whatever you want with it. I don't care anymore. I spotted an error, I tried to fix it. I have no interest in getting into an edit war with you. RobertM525 (talk) 04:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile is arguably just another platform, like consoles. The game's article even lists mobile devices as platforms in the infobox. Although my frustration in prior edit summaries was mainly directed at the article's history of persistent disruption from inexperienced and IP users (which seems to have been going on for years now). It might be time for yet another semi-protection if it continues. Dark Knight 2149 05:48, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AF Corse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duncan Cameron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:22, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]