Talk:AreYouKiddingTV

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

YouTube Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject YouTube To-do:

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see list.
Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles
Cleanup : See cleanup listing
Maintain : This WikiProject
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles
Other :
- Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages
- Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

A fact from AreYouKiddingTV appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 October 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that AreYouKiddingTV once gave out $5,000 to a student at East Carolina University who was the first to retrieve a clear key from a pool on campus?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/AreYouKiddingTV.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 17:16, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that AreYouKiddingTV never speaks during their challenges, and only communicates via a piece of paper taped to their chest? Source: https://muscleandhealth.com/wealth/are-you-kidding-viral-success/
- ALT1: ... that AreYouKiddingTV once gave out $5,000 to a student at East Carolina University who was the first to retrieve a clear key from a pool on campus? Source: https://www.miamilivingmagazine.com/post/behind-the-laughter-exploring-the-phenomenon-of-areyoukiddingtv
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Dongbei renaissance

Created by Johnson524 (talk). Self-nominated at 12:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/AreYouKiddingTV; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Hello! Article created around time of nom, no copyright violations (image fair use). I'd say a few wordings lean towards WP:PUFFERY, but it still mostly feels fine. I wish the sources were a little stronger but to be expected with recent pop culture topics. Otherwise things seem good. I'll tentative approve ALT1 because I think it's more eyecatching, but I can defer to your preference. toobigtokale (talk) 13:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Toobigtokale: Thank you for reviewing and for the feedback, cheers! Johnson524 14:26, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nom withdrawn after obvious quickfail. Cheers! Johnson524 04:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:AreYouKiddingTV/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WriterArtistDC (talk · contribs) 21:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Failed good article nomination on December 15, 2023

Upon its review on December 15, 2023, this good article nomination was quick-failed because:

it had an obviously non-neutral treatment of a topic,

thus making it ineligible for good article consideration. According to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, "All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly, proportionately and without bias."

This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 21:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Having never done a QF before, I do not know why the template created the boilerplate above, but omitted my actual comment, which is: "The article fails NPOV and GNG because it contains only primary sources, which are interviews of the two owners of the media account. Compare this with the current GAN for MrBeast, which has lots of secondary sources."--WriterArtistDC (talk) 21:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@WriterArtistDC: I have withdrawn my nomination. I think you're right about this, and while each of the interviews have interviewers providing secondary source information as well: I don't think it's enough, even if the article was theoretically good on everything else. I feel stupid, that was a pretty rookie mistake 😅 Cheers! Johnson524 04:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.