Template:Did you know nominations/Dongbei renaissance
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 09:13, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Dongbei renaissance
- ... that a rapper coined the term Dongbei renaissance to describe the cultural resurgence of China's rust belt? Source: https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1013425
- ALT1: ... that China's Rust Belt is having a cultural resurgence called the Dongbei renaissance? Source: https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1013425
- Reviewed:
- Comment: This is my fourth DYK nomination, so no QPQ is necessary
Created by Luiysia (talk). Self-nominated at 19:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Dongbei renaissance; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing: - See comment below
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: @Luiysia: Fivefold expansion, a little over seven days but should be OK. The only thing I'd like to see is more citations backing some of the claims made in the History section. Otherwise, the first hook and article look good. Cheers! Johnson524 21:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Luiysia, any updates? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:36, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Nominator hasn't edited since the day after the nomination, which was two weeks ago, so unless they return soon or another editor takes over the nomination appears to be abandoned. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:03, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- - Hi, I've added more citations to support the historical background theleekycauldron Johnson524. Apologies for the delay. Luiysia (talk) 19:15, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- awaiting further review, then :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- - Hi, I've added more citations to support the historical background theleekycauldron Johnson524. Apologies for the delay. Luiysia (talk) 19:15, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Johnson524: Ready for a second look. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Looks good now after fixes. @Luiysia: @Theleekycauldron: @Narutolovehinata5: this is my first DYK review, so I don't have prior experience in knowing if the citations provided are enough, but I do know it does not need to be perfect, and personally I think the changes made have made the article look GTG. Cheers! Johnson524 01:57, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Johnson524: Ready for a second look. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)