Jump to content

Talk:Archy (software)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

License

[edit]

Having visited FSF, I find no reference to a negative judgment of Archy by FSF. Where does the "does not recommend it for software" come from, and cannot it be described in different terms, i.e. without sounding as negative? For all I care I could add: ...and Microsoft doesn't recommend it for software, either." Until such neutral statement can be implemented, I have removed the sentences. IMHO Archy is a great idea and deserves at least neutral description. --Dorthonion 07:54, 05 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Trademarks

[edit]

Removed the little ™s as according to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks). -- Foofy 17:55, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

[edit]

Hmm, contrary to what the history seem to tell, the page is still protected as of October 18. -- Jugalator 07:09, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message on Wikipedia:Requests for page protection so somebody should fix it in a bit. -- Foofy 20:16, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

LEAP commentary

[edit]

I am removing the link to THE and LEAP because it is simply wrong. He is confusing the Leap keys with the Command key:

"When you want to type in a command, you hit the LEAP key and start typing the command (all commands are named) -- when you release the LEAP key the command is run."

That makes the entire article worthless, you can't make a commentary about something that you don't understand! --Foofy 02:14, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Funding

[edit]

I am about to remove the funding comment. The $2 million is closer to $1.8 million and went not to RCHI but to BZ Web for a project to design a ZUI for a major cell phone manufacturer. RCHI is pretty much a volunteer effort and has even lost many of those most knowledgeable about The Humane Interface. Nevertheless it retains some promise to provide direction for future humane computing environments. --Karpinski 22:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

[edit]

Obviously Archy is a radical detraction from computing as we have known it now for 30 years. There must be some criticisms of this approach to user interface design.

  • Why? To an extent Archy is just a few modifications to GNU Emacs (LEAP and COMMAND keys to eliminate modality). Are you trying to tell us that GNU Emacs is a radical detraction? RussNelson 03:23, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to be some kind of single-document editor with a CLI, that pretends to be an OS ("applications are obsolete"). Definitely not new. I'd rather say this concept is as outdated as 30-year-old Emacs. It goes back to the times when everything stored on a computer appeared as one huge chunk of data. It reduces a computer to a programmable typewriter. And it forces users to learn text commands and hotkeys instead of graphically exposing available functions.--87.162.12.32 (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are writing as if you never used Archy. Perhaps you should reserve judgement? RussNelson (talk) 21:41, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can think of some myself right now: Contrary to Raskins assertions about human interaction with interfaces, I think people have become very used to and good at using a graphical interface. This can even be seen outside computing. When I want to play music, I go over to my stereo and interact with a series of buttons and switches. If I want to turn the music up, I adjust a knob on the stereo to the right, I don't give the stereo a volume increase command in text form. I think following this pattern in computing is just as useful.

When user interface designing scientists evaluate the efficiency of an interface, they talk about how many clicks or keys it takes to get a command done. I think typing a series of commands to jump around a never ending document is not as easy as clicking Media player program + play button.

Archy is about your content, and allowing the particular content you want to just fly in before your eyes. If computers interfaced with our brains, I'd imagine it would be a lot like Archy. But that's not they do. I have to dig around a screen to find my content, and I don't think endlessly zooming around an infinite space is as efficient or understandable as the traditional file/folder paradigm.

  • That's as foolish as saying that there is no point in laying keys out in grid fashion, because people will always have to hunt and peck to find the key they want to type. RussNelson 03:23, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Software vendors might also have a completely different set of criticisms for replacing the idea of separate computer programs.

  • Jeff was not against the idea of separate computer programs. In fact he was perfectly in favor of people selling add-on programs for Archy. What he didn't want was a gazillion different paradigms for controlling each program. RussNelson 03:23, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--149.169.60.160 06:33, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure there are criticisms, just not many documented criticisms that we can link to. This has more to do with Archy's obscurity than it's quality. As for current interfaces being easy to use: just because it's "good enough" doesn't mean it's "good." I think most people see Archy as a new perspective that will lead to better interfaces, not the be-all and end-all of interfaces.  :) -Foofy 14:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Modelessness

[edit]
I took the liberty of moving modelessness out into its own section. It's a major characteristic of Archy, and if it's wrong, then most of Archy's design decisions are wrong. RussNelson 15:58, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Anon, I found something you might enjoy: The Anti-Mac Interface.
Modelessness
Modelessness means the computer interface should not have distinct modes that restrict the user's actions depending on the mode he or she is in. Users should be able to perform any task at any time. Although modelessness seems to be an object of veneration among some Macintosh interface designers, even the section on modelessness in the Macintosh Human Interface Guidelines [2] is primarily devoted to explaining how to use modes successfully. The basic problem presented by modelessness is that the user cannot cope with everything at once. Users need the interface to narrow their attention and choices so they can find the information and actions they need at any particular time. Real life is highly moded [11]: What you can do in the swimming pool is different from what you can do in the kitchen, and people can easily distinguish between the two because of the richness of the experience and the ease with which we can move between environments.
I'd love to see some stats on how good "context sensitive" toolbars and palettes work. --Foofy 15:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
there's modes and then there's modes. I think that Jef's original modelessness principle was tied to the fact that many programs lock you into answering a dialog. Sometimes the operating system doesn't even give you a choice to switch to a different program. From arguing with him over how the ZUI should work, I am pretty sure that he expected that the cursor would only move by key action. I'm not sure how he was going to move the cursor between zoomed documents. I'm not sure even he knew. RussNelson 15:58, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biased / Marketing-sounding voice?

[edit]

Just reading the first paragraph, this looks like a press release---getting people hyped up with interesting abstract concepts but few details. Obviously, there are details later on, but does not the intro sound distinctly non-wikipaedic? --N Vale (talk) 00:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmmmmm, no, not to me. It accurately describes the project without using marketing-style overblown language. RussNelson (talk) 02:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've clarified what the "radically new" means. I think this is what you feel that looked like a press release. I expect that it now should look more encyclopedic. Diego (talk) 10:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's the Canon Cat, for crying out loud. "Radically new?" Try "sold commercially in the 1980's." I see some talk about a "zooming user interface" at some point in the future, but the actual software on offer is essentially a Canon Cat clone...and I can't work out how you get from the Cat to Zoomworld, either--they seem to be built on radically different paradigms, and there's little consideration of how you join them together. This article is very press-releasey--talking up what is essentially vaporware in glowing terms.--158.111.4.26 (talk) 17:35, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attempts to Create this?

[edit]

Haven't there been any attempts to actually make this? It seems right now it's just theoretical. Seriously someone should make an X window manager following this design. --Matthew Bauer (talk) 04:19, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can download the latest executable here. The project has been abandoned since in favor of its more pragmatic sibling Ubiquity, which follows many of the same design principles. Diego (talk) 20:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Archy. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Archy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Archy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 April 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 23:49, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Archy → Archy (software) – Not primary per pageviews, and a dab page is necessary for "Archy" 162.208.168.92 (talk) 20:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). 162.208.168.92 (talk) 04:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:NOPRIMARY, in the absence of a primary topic, the dab page should be at the base name. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 21:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Archy_(software)&oldid=1198925669"