This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism
this article seems unneccesary, there is no "anti nazi" page or somthing, the parties who oppose lenin have already been noted.Zhukov19:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's a good article as it collects all the relevant information in one section and deal with opposition from both sides of the politicla spectrum, and there may not be an anti nazism page but there is a Anti-fascism and an Anti-communism page. Horses In The Skytalkcontributions
True, but lenin was a communist. But fair enough i suppose, it isnt worth deleting i jsut think its a tad unnessesary. Zhukov15:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's a fair point but I always take the view that seeing as wikipedia is on the internet there is no real need to delete pages that, although would not make a regular encyaeclopedia, are not factually incorrect or wholly useless.--Horses In The Sky18:35, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that this article is only useless because it has not been expanded. Perhaps if more detail were ventured into the post-1924 Anti-Leninism section, this article would carry increased usefulness. Lincoln18712:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think the content is good, but the topic is incohereht, so that the argument that there is no "anti nazi" page remains: having an article on an incoherent topic that is dependent on information from outside the article, is not a good idea, but rather a potential cause of confusions. I think instead the article contents should be redistributed to various places within Leninism, and if that article becomes too big, that article should be split into subtopics that are coherent. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 09:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree the topic is incoherent. There is no thing, no movement, called "anti-Leninism", whereas there are movements called "anti-fascism", "anti-communism", "anti-capitalism" or "anti-Stalinism". "Anti-Leninism" is more like "anti-vegetarianism" or "anti-conservatism": plenty of people are against vegetarianism or against conservatism, but there have not been definable, visible movements or organisations that describe themselves as such or are described as such by others. BobFromBrockley (talk) 09:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The aforementioned scope issues haven't been addressed in the last decade. It would be sufficient to address opposition to Lenin's platform in a section of the existing Leninism article. For instance, its coverage of Trotsky's opposition is sufficient. I don't see anything I'd immediately merge from this article. czar01:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
