Jump to content

Talk:Anthem for the Year 2000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Anthem large.jpg

[edit]

Image:Anthem large.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be awesome if someone could add information (i.e. trivia) about the song and videoclip. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.175.82.197 (talk) 17:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Anthem for the Year 2000/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Currently at Stub class, hints for improvement:

Start class:

  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox
  • Green tickY A lead section giving an overview of the single/song
  • Green tickY A track listing
  • Red XN Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current single/song; a band navbox is insufficient)
  • Green tickY Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

  • Red XN All the start class criteria
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  • Red XN At least one other section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  • Red XN A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  • Red XN A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.
  • Red XN Independent in-line references supporting major/controversial claims

B class:

  • Red XN All the C class criteria
  • Red XN A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  • Red XN A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  • Red XN No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
  • Red XN No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
Summary: Primary personnel must be specified for Start class; more information and references needed for C-class;Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 09:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 09:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 07:57, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anthem for the Year 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]