Jump to content

Talk:Anderson Park (New Jersey)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Anderson Park (New Jersey). Anderson Park (Montclair, New Jersey) created as a redirect. Jenks24 (talk) 07:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Anderson Park, New JerseyAnderson Park (Montclair, New Jersey) – If my memory serves me, Anderson Park is not a location within the state of New Jersey, just a park in Montclair. Does it need to use the same naming conventions as if Anderson Park was a CDP like Upper Montclair? Mitch32(There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 09:35, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just a bit worried the general reader might not understand by the title that this is a park, not a town such as West Paterson or East Paterson (WP:POINT using old names, now Woodland Park and Elmwood Park). I just figure it would be somewhat easier to understand. The same would apply to the other two Anderson Parks that we have, just a proposal overall though. Mitch32(There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 05:27, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That's a good point. I would support a move to Anderson Park (New Jersey). Montclair isn't necessary, but I agree with your proposal for parenthetical disambiguation. And you're right that disambiguating with a comma is usually reserved for cities, towns, and other settlements.--SGCM (talk) 05:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral - Awaiting Comment On the WikiProject New Jersey page, I recommended you reach out to Alansohn and I was happy to see he already threw his hat in the ring (as I would tend to defer to his judgment on these topics). I posted this there: I'm not familiar with Anderson Park vis-a-vis Montclair. But if it just a section of Montclair, why not incorporate relevant material into the Montclair, New Jersey article and create both Anderson Park, New Jersey and Anderson Park (Montclair, New Jersey) as redirects to the Montclair article. The questions to be asked are: Is there enough discrete information to justify its own article (as compared to other relevant/related articles)? how much information would the article have that isn't redundant on Montclair, New Jersey or elsewhere. Would this information (and other Montclair neighborhoods) be better served if incorporated into Montclair, New Jersey?--ColonelHenry (talk) 20:51, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it existed, and I'm just doing my duty as a resident of New Jersey, half-ass whatever is required. :) - Upper Montclair is the only neighborhood that has his own article, and being it is its own CDP, I'd argue that can survive. I'm not opposed to merging Anderson Park, but it was there, made my move because I don't want to confuse readers that is not a town. Mitch32(There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 22:54, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anderson Park (New Jersey). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:17, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]