Talk:An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Television: Episode coverage / The Twilight Zone

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Twilight Zone task force.

Westerns Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Tz 142.jpg

Image:Tz 142.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Preview for Next Week's Story

What's here is interesting, but couldn't someone find the preview portion of the previous week's Twilight Zone, i.e., promoting this show? (If, indeed, such was broadcast and still exists.) WHPratt (talk) 15:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It exists, in the article for the previous week's episode:

“

Next time on The Twilight Zone, a departure from the norm. A program shot in its entirety in France. A film so special and so unique that for the first time in the five years we've been presenting The Twilight Zone we're offering a film shot by others. Adapted and directed by Robert Enrico. Winner of the Cannes Film Festival of 1962, as well as other major international awards. Ambrose Bierce's "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge."

”

travisl (talk) 18:25, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

D'oh! I didn't realize that every episode was documented. Thanks.WHPratt (talk) 02:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Twilight Zone version complete?

I saw no mention of the original running time. Unless it was less than 25 minutes to begin with, it must have been slightly edited to fit the TV show's time slot. Some deatil would be nice. WHPratt (talk) 15:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB says the original was 28 minutes. The Twilight Zone version must have been, originally, about 25 minutes, and it must be cut even further when it runs in a "modern" half-hour slot with many more commercials. WHPratt (talk) 15:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Only broadcast twice?

Whatever the agreement was, I saw this on the old Sci Fi channel when it first arrived on cable, complete with the nonstandard Rod Serling introduction explaining the film's origin. 69.134.206.104 (talk) 01:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I too saw it air as a Twilight Zone rerun episode on WPIX "11 Alive" in New York City on a Saturday afternoon in the late 1970s. It may not be in the current syndicated package, but it must have been included in some of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.63.122.75 (talk) 00:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I have to disagree on this section, we need some kind of source backing it up. I saw it on syndication in Cleveland back in the 80s - more than once. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.35.224.179 (talk) 17:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was included in the SyFy Channel's Twilight Zone Marathon over the 2015-16 new year's holiday. WHPratt (talk) 23:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was also included in the 2022-23 New Year's marathon. 2601:204:D400:7310:5C6B:4F71:D2B0:CD0E (talk) 10:35, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is on at this moment as well, on the eve of 2024, so I believe this line can be excised. Zaathras (talk) 03:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removed as it is not factually correct. Since no credible source was quoted, automatically removed as per Wikipedia MOS.--Abebenjoe (talk) 07:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

5 Episode is on Netflix

I want to point out that this episode has been included with all the other episodes of The Twilight Zone on Netflix. I don't know if this should be included or if it is too minor to update the article with — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beez1717 (talk • contribs) 03:42, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081023123313/http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/35918/An-Occurrence-at-Owl-Creek-Bridge/details to https://movies.nytimes.com/movie/35918/An-Occurrence-at-Owl-Creek-Bridge/details

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]