This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube
Airrack has been exposed for faking videos, doxxing the pilot, also with leaked messages with other big YouTubers/creators who criticized him of what he done wrong, etc. Proof from YouTube creators "Soggy Cereal," "Vyzme," "Internet Anarchist," "Pegasus," etc. The article needs to be updated. 69.1.59.248 (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@69.1.59.248 Wikipedia has a policy that states that all content on Wikipedia must be verifiable. The editor who adds new content has the responsibility to prove it. To prove the added text you need to cite reliable sources. The source you cited was Youtube which is not considered a reliable source and hence cannot be used. If the YouTube videos you mentioned contains references to sources which are considered reliable by wikipedia then you can add those sources instead. To see what type of sources are considered reliable sources you can check Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Reliable source examples.
Also please don't revert or add the content again without citing a proper reliable source. You can also reply with the sources you find here and get consensus before adding it to the article.
Let's start with the first link. It appears to be an article from Dexerto.
1. Regarding whether or not Dexerto is a reliable source has been debated a couple of times. This discussion here ended in a weak concensus that the reliability of Dexerto should be considered on a case to case basis. In the summary of the dicussion it was noted that it is rarely suitable for BLP and that it is better to find an alternative source.
2. The second link seems to be from Poptopic. After doing a quick search, I could not find any prior discussions/consensus on whether or not it is a reliable source. You can probably exhaust these options first and then start an RfC if that those options did not work out.
3. Google Docs could be considered as self published sources and according to Wikipedia's policy, self published sources are generally considered unreliable unless they are "produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications".
These are probably some of the reasons why your previous edits were reverted.
In December 2023, a YouTuber Soggy Cereal has exposed Airrack for faking his content. Soggy Cereal tells the viewes that the beginning of December from Airrack’s “I Have To Delete My Channel” video that Airrack announced that starting at December 1st to December 31st that he promised to his fans and viewers that he will upload one video everyday and that if he missed a upload, then MrBeast will delete his channel.[1] It turns out from Soggy Cereal that most of his "challenge" videos were prerecorded from September. For example, the timer on Airrack’s watch says "Sep. 12th" and the meat Airrack was holding has the expiration date that says "September 18th." As of February 2024, Airrack’s channel remains on YouTube and wasn’t deleted by MrBeast.[2]
In February 2024, Soggy Cereal made another video on exposing Airrack for doxxing a pilot from Airrack’s flying to Angle video, and adding fake dubs to the pilot of the words that the pilot never said. Also mentioned that Airrack faked both riding a bike on the ice to Angle and driving at a straight line.[3][4] Saying on the ice video, Airrack failed to drive on ice and the bicycle fell on the ice, down the water sea. Airrack failed to bring the bicycle back up which cost people working at the bicycles almost losing their jobs. Instead, Airrack said he has a flying jet to drive to Angle.[5] The location Airrack went wasn’t at Angle, it was somewhere else about 200,000 ft away from it. Soggy Cereal said on the Airrack’s straight line video that Airrack provided a link of the map providing that he drove at a straight line.[6] But he mentioned that the locations Airrack appeared were not located on or near the straight line map. One of those examples is where he and his friends was near “Welcome To South Dakota” sign right near Interstate 29 (I-29) near the North-South Dakota border where it was 40 miles away from the straight line route. There are lots of more things Airrack has done wrong according to Soggy Cereal.[7][8][9]69.1.59.248 (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
