Talk:Agamassan
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Query
[edit]I was told by a welding gas seller that acetylene cylinders were filled with Fuller's Earth. I'll attempt to locate a reference on this. LorenzoB 06:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- Here is a list of German Approved materials. I suspect fuller's earth may be a component of AGA and other porous materials. Aatomic1 (talk) 13:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
But... what is it?
[edit]This article is irritatingly vague on exactly WHAT this is. The specific materials and compositions should be explicitly listed in the first or second paragraph.
This "minor detail" is not something to be left as a vague mention at the end without any references. DMahalko (talk) 22:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Agamassan/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| I have rated this article as a stub since it has a stub tag. I'll leave a different opinion to someone else. Umalee 16:56, 14 April 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 16:56, 14 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 06:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Violation or just Impolite, 2Be Cloning this article(non copyright copyleft or???)
[edit]Read & surfed 90min through copyright and duplicating Wikipedia. Here is cloned page: http://www.liquisearch.com/agamassan My endless slog through copyright and citing, crediting.... unsure if that page SOP A-ok, or only poor manners not to credit with URL to the source(cloned mirror), the wiki SOURCE BEING https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agamassan (yep, on a mobile).
Maybe a goof with ...LIQUI... citing the source, at very bottom of WEBPAGE Source: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
SO FYI, there you go.
So free-encyclopedia-ware....but sheesh, at least credit the source, the wikipedia page being cloned. But maybe common sense not apply, free wiki, free cloning, with no credit given is 'common', pun intended, on the world wide plagiarizi-web ultracrepidarian-net.