Jump to content

Talk:Agacheri

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Agacheri/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Aintabli (talk · contribs) 02:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 05:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I will review this shortly. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 05:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Noted some prose issues below. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No issues with prose. Article is readable and not overly technical. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 02:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. MOS is complied with. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). I spot-checked both sources and found no issues. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
2c. it contains no original research. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Left some suggestions regarding further sources to incorporate and areas where information may be missing. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator was able to add in some more info which is always nice. While the article looks short, the sources do not allow for a longer article. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 02:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). No unnecessary details. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. unbiased. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. N/A IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. N/A IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
7. Overall assessment. On hold until Aintabli addresses my comments thus far. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator has now addressed all of my feedback. As shown above, all GANC are met. Good work! IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 02:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.