Talk:Afterglow

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Afterglow article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Droughts / Wildfires / General Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Droughts and wildfires task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the General meteorology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Added picture

Though WikiPedia is not a collection of images, I believe my added image improves the encyclopedia by giving a better view of what afterglow looks like. CindyT/P/C 00:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remove references to alpenglow

I left some remarks on the talk pages for both Alpenglow and Belt of Venus, so please see those as well if you're interested.. The use of alpenglow here isn't right, and the article is quite confusing as well. One can mention Rayleigh Scattering without all this confusing stuff about high energy and high frequency light, and there is no backscattering in alpenglow, as I described in the other talk pages. Lastly, what is with the mention of the planet Venus being the brightest "star" visible opposite to the belt of venus? That's just nonsense.. Venus can be visible or not, depending on the position of its orbit about the sun. The Belt of Venus is there every day, at the anti-solar point, but Venus need not be. Not to mention it is already confusing to try and make sure these two uses of "venus" are distinguishable, there is no need to bring the planet into the discussion incorrectly. Unless anyone objects, I would like to take out all of the references to alpenglow, do a bit of a better job explaining that this has nothing to do with the planet venus other than that they were named after the same deity, and make the language a little more comfortable to read. Thoughts? Comments? HappyDa (talk) 17:24, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]