Talk:Adobe Animate

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Mid-importance).

Animation Bottom‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge with FutureSplash Animator

Resolved

The subjects of these two articles are the same and both are smaller than the optimal size. Codename Lisa (talk) 04:17, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Almost the same, if I'm reading it right: they're the same program but different versions, and the very old version isn't central to Adobe Flash Professional. I'm guessing that if they get merged, eventually that article will be rewritten to focus on the software as it is rather than its ancient history, and people who are looking for FutureSplash will get a redirect to nothing useful. Ideally, that wouldn't happen, as anyone doing a substantial rewrite would check the what-links-here and either split the material back out or give it a section heading for the redirect to point to. But really I'm guessing it would happen. --Dan Wylie-Sears 2 (talk) 04:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Needs More Information

I found the article fairly short. I would suggest to add more information about the use of Animate CC.

What is Animate CC?McDanielMuzeyyen (talk) 22:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional tone, non-neutral Point of View

Particularly in the descriptions of the last two releases (AA 2018 and 2019), the text reads like advertising copy; not at all like an encyclopaedia! e.g. "Our machine learning platform makes it happen automatically." Our?

The entire article may present an unbalanced picture of the capabilities of AA, rather than what Wikipedia prefers: a neutral Point of View (NPOV).

yoyo (talk) 15:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it was probably copy-pasted from Adobe's website. --Benimation (talk) 12:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source for the data claim that Adobe Animate was partially written in Haxe

I am unable to find any source to back that claim up. Logo4poop (talk) 01:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Version history

Wikipedia policy (WP:NOTCHANGELOG) specifically says we should not have a version history. MrOllie (talk) 15:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As that policy states, A list of every version is inappropriate. MrOllie (talk) 16:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]