Jump to content

Talk:Adecco

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

There is an advertisement template there which I tried to justify to then try to correct where possible. Yet I didn't find anything significant that would make this ảrticle look like promotion to me. Could someone please clarify this to me, maybe I miss something. Or is that template wrong there? ----Bartholomeow7 (talk) 09:06, April 17 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 4 September 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 16:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The Adecco GroupAdecco – The use of the leading "the" and the suffix (group) in RS is mixed, with no evidence that it is considered an integral part of the name. The two moves (in 2016 and 2017), while following official naming of the company (WP:OFFICIAL) are thus inconsistent with English Wikipedia titling conventions, both in general ([WP:UCRN]], WP:CONCISE) and company specific (WP:NCCORP), which indicate that such prefixes and suffixes should not be included where not required to fully identify the topic to a person familiar with the general subject area. Alpha3031 (tc) 06:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support. Simpler is usually better in my book. Lewisguile (talk) 16:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.