Talk:Ace (gamer)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Kentucky Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).

Video games: Esports Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the esports task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (0 participants)
PLAY: The Games Festival (1 participant)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (0 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (4 participants)
Dr. Wily (10 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Requested move 12 September 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed, with unanimous consensus. bd2412 T 01:11, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– Standardize all non-compliant video game player articles per WP:NCVG, per consensus at Talk:Attach (video game player)#Requested move 3 September 2018. feminist (talk) 06:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Maplestrip, Gonnym, Biexx, Lee Vilenski, Xezbeth, and Dissident93: pinging participants at previous RM. feminist (talk) 06:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support, per consistency and concensus. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 07:56, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support as above — bieχχ (talk) 10:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:NCVG, WP:CONSISTENCY and WP:CONSENSUS at latest discussion. --Gonnym (talk) 11:24, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I don't even think this was needed, as the last one passed with no opposition. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 17:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- A lot of things aren't needed, but some editors like to object to changes for the sake of objecting and then go and yell that the move was done without discussion. Better wait out the 7 days just to save that headache. --Gonnym (talk) 23:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - I mean I'm all for due process, but we just held another proposal with no opposition for the same exact thing, so this one wasn't needed at all. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 20:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:NCVG and others.Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom (talk) 18:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.