Jump to content

Talk:Accession of Albania to the European Union

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Replace wikitable

[edit]

With permission of other editors i will eliminate the wikitable including a chronology of the relations with the European Union and will substitute it with some paragraphs. No source will be lost. --EuropeanAlbania (talk) 21:31, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

10th Anniversary of the Agenda 2014

[edit]

Added the missing info about the 10th anniversary of the Greek government's "Agenda 2014" for the integration of Albania into the European Union, proposed back in 2004, which coincides with the granting of Albania its EU Candidacy Status. --SILENTRESIDENT 16:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Accession of Albania to the European Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Accession of Albania to the European Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Expand

[edit]

The article needs expansion. I do not have the time to do so, but a few things to be added: public opinion in Albania, position of international organizations/other countries, financial and political help by the EU etc, each of them on seperate sections. Ktrimi991 (talk) 16:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, to clarify and ping @Eu6:@Khirurg:@Dr.K.:, the content on Tsipras is OK as far as it is placed on a separate section dedicated to the position of international organizations/other countries on the accession of Albania. Ktrimi991 (talk) 16:29, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, use relevant sources instead of a Wikipedia link. Ktrimi991 (talk) 16:30, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That seems to me like a good suggestion. Dr. K. 16:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree as well. Now it's in a more sensible location and somewhat fits. I did change the source from a Wikipedia link to the actual news site. --Eu6 (talk) 02:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine now. Khirurg (talk) 18:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]