Talk:Absorbing element
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Absorbing elements for multiary operations
[edit]For a nullary operation on a set X, which is just an element x of X, all elements of X are considered to be absorbing elements, regardless of whether they are equal to x.
For a unary operation f, an absorbing element is simply a fixed point of f.
In general, an absorbing element for a multiary operation and a position i is an element x of X such that applying the operation gives x whenever the element in the ith position is x. An absorbing element is an element of X that is an absorbing element for every position. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:08, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Absorbing element. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070630043408/http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/AbsorbingElement.html to http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/AbsorbingElement.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Further generalization
[edit]Why does the result of a product with the absorbing element have to be equal to the absorbing element? If for example we observe (or perhaps with just left or right but not both), for some , this is effectively an absorbing element too, yes? 50.35.103.217 (talk) 00:23, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- This might be a good idea. However, wikipedia requires it (per WP:OR) to be published elsewhere before it can be mentioned here. So if you find a reference, feel free to add a section here, called e.g. "Generalized absorbing elements". - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:36, 16 August 2018 (UTC)