Talk:AFC Champions League Two

On 24 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from AFC Cup to AFC Champions League Two. The result of the discussion was moved.

Fair use rationale for Image:AlJaish.gif

Image:AlJaish.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Consh.jpg

Image:Consh.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Consh.jpg

Image:Consh.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in AFC Cup

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of AFC Cup's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "slots":

From 2015 AFC Champions League: "AFC Champions League slots allocated for 2015-2016". AFC. 4 December 2014.
From 2015 AFC Cup: "AFC Cup slots decided for 2015-2016 editions". AFC. 4 December 2014.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:14, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Qualifying dilemma

Can someone help me on this? Global F.C. qualified to the qualifying play-off in the 2017 AFC Cup by winning the 2016 UFL Cup. But it looks like Global will also win the 2016 United Football League (they are leading six points with two games to go) and the winner of the league will qualify in the group stage of the 2017 AFC Cup.

On the likelihood that Global will also win the League;

1. Where will Global qualify, on the group stage or the qualifying play-off? (They first qualifed in the qualifying play-off for winning the cup, which was held first.)

There are two likely situations that will happen here;

2. If Global will be placed in the group stage of the cup, which team will qualify now for the qualifying play-off, the runner-up of the league or the domestic cup? This looks like the more possible outcome as the group stage is better than the qualifying play-off of course.

3. If Global will be placed in the qualifying play-off instead, which team will now then qualify for the group stage, the runner-up of the league or the domestic cup?

Thanks in advance. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:24, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 May 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved oer consensus and redirecting AFC Champions League -2 to the article. (non-admin closure) Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Cup → AFC Champions League Two – The Asian Football Confederation confirmed on its official website today that the AFC Cup has been rebranded as AFC Champions League Two, and that the records and statistics of the AFC Cup will be carried forward to the AFC Champions League Two. See here. Hence, the AFC Cup page should be moved to "AFC Champions League Two". Hashim-afc (talk) 19:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The name of this competition is AFC Champions League 2 , Why change to irrelevant AFC CUP title , I change it. Don't revert it incorrectly again. MMMM97 (talk) 19:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. From the page history, AFC Champions League -2 and some others in recent part-auto edit summaries about undiscussed moves today should be deleted since no articles have these links. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. Name change from 2 (which the AFC had) to Two (that they have now announced) should reflect the article name. Certainly not minus 2. Matilda Maniac (talk) 22:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. The name of the competition is Two and not -2, seeing from what they have now announced. SparklessPlug (talk | contribs) 08:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right. At first, it was announce as AFC Champions League 2, but was later officially branded as AFC Champions League Two. So the article title should be AFC Champions League Two.

Regpath (talk) 19:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 09:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Giant Snowman 09:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Kiilvish (talk) 09:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Oh, I just now saw this move request after moving the page back to its last stable title—I became aware of the page move log mess because Talk:AFC Cup was a broken redirect in the moment. If a fellow admin would like to move it back to AFC Champions League -2 while it is being discussed, please feel free to do so. I have no opinion on the matter. ✗plicit 14:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - please can you keep it as AFC Cup for now, because this was the original title when I made the move request. Hashim-afc (talk) 15:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It should remain at AFC Cup until this discussion ends. Giant Snowman 15:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support It is officially re-branded as 'AFC Champions League Two' so the title should be so.

Regpath (talk) 19:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.