Talk:731 (The X-Files)

731 (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

731 (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 3) series, a good topic. It is also part of the Mythology of The X-Files, Volume 2 series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 22, 2007	Articles for deletion	Kept
January 13, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
July 26, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted
December 23, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted
Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as High-importance).

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:731 3x10.jpg

Image:731 3x10.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Banned in Japan?

Is it or isn't it? If it is, then note it in the article, with sources for why it was done. If it isn't, then remove the cat. --Raijinili (talk) 15:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:731 (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 16:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

"The episode's production was successful for several involved, earning director of photography John Bartley an award nomination for his work, and securing Bowman the job of directing the series' subsequent film adaptation The X-Files." Can you be a bit more specific. What award and who are the "several involved" and in what ways were they successful. Doesn't need much but its a little vague..♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've specified a bit more with it. Does it look alright? GRAPPLE X 16:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes fine.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Director Rob Bowman called the episode one of his all time favorites." Citation needed..♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Added. Was the same as the next ref but I've added another use of it for clarity. GRAPPLE X 16:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Excellent, I rather like that old Japanese photo and the production text.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:47, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 731 (The X-Files). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/60mwtBExs?url=http://www.theasc.com/asc_news/awards/awards_history.php to http://www.theasc.com/asc_news/awards/awards_history.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]