Talk:609th Special Operations Squadron

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Thailand Low‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger

This article and 349th Night Fighter Squadron should be merged per WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME An article about a unit should be placed at "Name (optional disambiguator)". The name should generally be the official name used by the armed forces to which the unit base belongs. When a unit or base has had multiple names over the course of its existence, the title should generally be the last name used; however, exceptions can be made in cases where the subject is clearly more commonly known by one of the previous names. The exception does not apply. The 349th was a training unit only and was manned for little more than a year. Neither the 349th article nor this one are overly long, another reason for dividing. Combining the articles presents the entire history of the unit in a single place. --Lineagegeek (talk) 18:53, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - The premise that units sharing a lineage are identical units requiring a single article has been rejected on multiple occasions in similar merge discussions: [1][2][3][4][5][6] --Kkmurray (talk) 17:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But it has been accepted on even more. The alternative would be to eliminate the 349th article for lack of notability in this case. --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]