Talk:920th Air Refueling Squadron

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 920th Air Refueling Squadron article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Merger

No consensus to merge. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:17, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Agree Bwmoll3 (talk) 23:21, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - no need to merge articles on distinct and individually notable USAAF and USAF units per WP:MERGE and WP:IAR --Kkmurray (talk) 03:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are not distinct, so why? --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:17, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Although the USAF considers the units to be the same, they have different names and missions and were active at different times. --Kkmurray (talk) 14:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See related discussion at Talk:622d Expeditionary Air Refueling Squadron--Lineagegeek (talk) 20:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 920th Air Refueling Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150928001721/http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=9677 to http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=9677

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Please use this space to discuss the proposed merge of 420th Bombardment Squadron into this article. Pinging @Buckshot06:. Joyous! Noise! 23:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing, given that no case has been made, there is no support, discussion is stale and a previous similar proposal failed in 2013 (those count-arguments still seem to hold). Klbrain (talk) 10:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]