Talk:5796 Klemm

Delete

Delete and, more importantly, all others like it, which fail WP:NASTRO and WP:NOTABLITY. Bot needed. — Chrisrus (talk) 04:46, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy deletion tag because lack of notability is not a reason for speedy deletion. If you want to delete the article, go to WP:AFD —teb728 t c 08:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ok, sorry, please let's move on. Chrisrus (talk) 17:25, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help request

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Multiple system breakdown — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisrus (talk • contribs) 16:19, 28 July 2013‎

No, there has not been a system breakdown. Speedy deletion is used only for the strictly-defined reasons listed at WP:CSD, and lack of notability is explicitly not one of them, see WP:CSD#Non-criteria #5 and #6. If you think this should be deleted, you should use WP:AFD, though if there is a large class of similar articles, you might do well to start with a discussion at WP:WikiProject Astronomical objects. JohnCD (talk) 16:31, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the problem. The problem is these articles need deletion. Please just forget about the speedy deletion, I made a mistake there, but instead focus on the problem. Chrisrus (talk) 17:24, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]