Talk:3C 236

Entry

Hey, I know it's a terrible entry. I'm confident those with infinite time to burn, who are always watching new entries, will do a fine job of cleaning it up and such.

I was a little shocked to find no entry. For all I know, there IS an entry, under some other name. But I can't figure out what it would be.

This object is notable because it is without a doubt the most energetic Galaxy, in the sense of shooting out high energy jets. Those really smart scientist types know what that means. FX, interesting (talk) 02:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deleted. Bad information. FX (talk) 20:17, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Permission for Photos

If I get permission from the owner of a photo, does that mean it can be used? And what proof is required by the Wikipedians? Who do I send the proof to?

Thanks. FX (talk) 20:08, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Worst talk page ever

I feel so ignored.

But what a cool entry people turned this into. I get a huge kick out of watching my pathetic beginnings evolve under the skilled hands of wikipedians, into what actually is a decent page, with real use and meaning.

There is even a picture!

Thanks wikipeeps. You rock. FX (talk) 18:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have anything to add other than I read your words so don't feel ignored! WilliamKF (talk) 02:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, User:CarloscomB built a duplicate article for this galaxy... I've just redirected it here, after trying to fix that mess up. 76.66.195.63 (talk) 08:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well OK then!

Thanks for the reply. If you do read my occasional rants, you know that the messaging system here sucks. But, unless you have this on your watchlist, you may never know I replied. FX (talk) 12:55, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted photo request

Since the article has a photo now, a request is kind of redundant. Jjnishiyama (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but how did it get there?

How did somebody get permission to use it? FX (talk) 16:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hubble pictures, like most works of the US Federal Government, are in the public domain. Mhardcastle (talk) 08:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 3C 236. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]