Jump to content

Talk:2 Hours Doing Nothing/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 19:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments

[edit]
 Done Chompy Ace 00:21, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 00:56, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Chompy Ace 00:38, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, source and reference have changed Chompy Ace 00:31, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The following sentences need references (or need references moved to the end of the sentence):
  • "A viewer counted Didit blinking 362 times."
 Done Chompy Ace 00:47, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Didit originally planned for the video to be only 10 minutes long..."
 Done, removed partial sentences that are unneeded Chompy Ace 00:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Several Internet memes were published on Facebook and Instagram."
 Done sentence removed as unnecessary Chompy Ace 00:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "...with the number of downloads reaching 10,000 as of early August."
 Done, sentence within the Video game adaptation section has removed Chompy Ace 00:52, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The following sentences need rephrasing (since they should all be in past-tense):
  • Change "is shot" to "was shot"
 Done Chompy Ace 00:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Change "the video is a sarcastic commentary" to "the video was a sarcastic commentary"
 Done Chompy Ace 00:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Change "video is only meant for" to "video was only meant for"
 Done Chompy Ace 00:35, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, removed per WP:NOTDEFINING Chompy Ace 00:23, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some Dude From North Carolina, may I ask why is the Adaptation section removed? It is significant to know that the video has been adapted to a game, and it is supported by a reliable source. GeraldWL 01:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Surprise! Chompy Ace 02:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.