Talk:229762 Gǃkúnǁʼhòmdímà

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on (229762) 2007 UK126. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the best dwarf planet

best name — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.255.14.154 (talk) 23:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Remember, this is not a forum for discussion of the object itself, but a talk page where we discuss what to improve on the section. Also, please remember to sign your comments by typing four of these: ~ 2601:600:8680:9150:ADF0:558A:BFED:3D7C (talk) 16:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Naming rationale

Has there been and research or interviews with the astronomers involved as to why they selected such a name? Given their surnames, I presume none of the astronomers is actually from Namibia and this is not a Namibian discovery. Is it a kind of private joke? Does the name have some personal significance to the discovers? Surely, they must have been asked why they would pick a name that both deviates from the traditional convention of naming celestial objects according to Greek mythology, and which sounds very alien in civilised languages. Of course, a link to such an article would be appreciated 2A02:2454:9873:5900:E844:5C61:E14F:DD8 (talk) 11:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Civilized languages"? And there is no convention of naming such objects from Greek mythology. The reason was to honor or bring attention to the San, who get short shrift in astronomical naming. Same for 469705 ǂKá̦gára. — kwami (talk) 02:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate comments about "civilised languages" aside, it is true that the only way I can ever find this article without a link or copy-paste (i.e. having the name there already) is typing in 2007 UK126 (the old provisional designation). So there might be some nicknames going around for the object. I wonder how the name is mostly pronounced among astronomers? (I would personally read the name using the English approximation given in the article.) Double sharp (talk) 05:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would just write it as "Gkunhomdima", which seems to work just fine in search engines. --Tai Ferret (talk) 19:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Though Gǃkúnǁʼhòmdímà may be a strange name to English ears, it is the original name that was submitted by the discoverers. It would be incredibly rude to change it, and not just for the discoverers, but for people of Namibia. Englishizing the name would be incredibly rude and would undermine the culture, even if it is more simplistic to English users. 2601:600:8680:9150:ADF0:558A:BFED:3D7C (talk) 16:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No need to rename. Just create a redirect "Gkunhomdima". Ruslik_Zero 20:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]