Talk:2025 SA20
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 2 November 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from 2024–25 SA20 to 2025 SA20. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 2 November 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. charlotte 👸♥ 21:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
To use the name in which year the event has taken place rather than the cricket season. Many other cricket league are named liked that.
For example 2024 International League T20 was also played at the cricket season of 2023-24 but it is named in the year which it was held. Kumarpramit (talk) 08:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support: To be consistent with other cricket tournaments and also the standard naming convention. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 14:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
League progression table
[edit]There are arguments that this is unnecessary, repeats information from other tables, and is, in itself, utterly unsourced - unless anyone can find a suitable source for this directly rather than synthesising the data from other sources
More importantly, it's not working. Cape Town got 5 points. This table says they got 2. If you can fix that then there might be an argument for keeping it here. Otherwise it looks ridiculous. I rather have the suspicion that there are editors more interested in a range of pretty, coloured tables rather than thinking about whether the table they're adding is necessary or not as well. Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Module:CricketLeagueProgression adds 2 points by default. To change that we'll have to create a new module. So, it's better to just not include the table. Also, why not display the bonus points column in the points table? Vestrian24Bio 09:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Bonus points need to be included, certainly. Makes little sense otherwise. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)