Talk:2024 Kobani clashes
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article 2024 Kobani clashes, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
Requested move 17 December 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page speedily moved by User:Des Vallee. This article is only a week old. – wbm1058 (talk) 02:06, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
2024 Kobani offensive → 2024 Kobani clashes – It does not appear like their is an "offensive" yet more like clashes and air strikes so i propose a name change Braganza (talk) 19:37, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Noble Attempt, Des Vallee, and Ecrusized: Braganza (talk) 20:04, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Agree: The current battle situation seems to mostly be focused on heavy artillery, drone strikes, and some attempted ground operations on the Tishrin Dam and other bridges along the Euphrates which have not produced any results. I can move the article now if consensus is reached and move it back if the situation changes, especially if the reported amassing of Turkish troops along the border with Kobani develops further. Thank you for bringing this up! Noble Attempt (talk) 20:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- I haven't edited that article before, but I'm in favor of removing it since there doesn't seem to be an offensive in Kobani region. Ecrusized (talk) 00:02, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Personally, I would suggest a merge into “Operation Dawn of Freedom” since both conflicts seem to be related. Also, there’s a similar discussion on the other talk page. So based on that I say merge. 2600:1702:5870:5930:5C77:9C6A:2E8E:CF1D (talk) 00:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- i kinda agree but i am not sure, an actual offensive appears likely so and the main "Operation Dawn of Freedom" campaign pretty much stopped by now. So i think it should stay Braganza (talk) 12:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Personally, I would suggest a merge into “Operation Dawn of Freedom” since both conflicts seem to be related. Also, there’s a similar discussion on the other talk page. So based on that I say merge. 2600:1702:5870:5930:5C77:9C6A:2E8E:CF1D (talk) 00:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per others. Des Vallee (talk) 00:47, 18 December 2024 (UTC)