Talk:2022 Peach Bowl

2022 Peach Bowl has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 8, 2025. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

College football Mid‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Georgia (U.S. state): Atlanta Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state)

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Atlanta task force.

Atlanta task force To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate Atlanta related articles from Unassessed Atlanta articles and Category:Unknown-importance Atlanta articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Atlanta articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Infobox : Atlanta articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Atlanta
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Atlanta
Stubs : Work on stubs in Category:Atlanta stubs.
Other : * Help out with articles placed in Category:Atlanta articles needing attention
- Add {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)|class=|importance=|atlanta=|atlanta-importance=}} project banner to Atlanta-related articles to talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get Atlanta into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Crooked Creek (Georgia), Ed Defore Sports Complex, Audery Mill Creek, More (Georgia)... More (U.S.)...
Assess : Rate articles from Unassessed Georgia (U.S. state) articles and Unknown-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category.
Geographical coordinates : more Georgia (U.S. state) articles missing geocoordinate data
Infobox : Georgia (U.S. state) articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Georgia (U.S. state)
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Georgia (U.S. state)
Stubs : Work on stubs in articles in Georgia (U.S. state) stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) radio station stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) road stubs and Georgia (U.S. state) geography stubs.
Other : *Deletion sorting: Please see the collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state) - compiled by WikiProject Deletion sorting
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Georgia (U.S. state) articles needing attention
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
- Tag the talk pages of Georgia (U.S. state)-related articles with the {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}} banner.
- Get Georgia (U.S. state) to a featured article quality standard

Text and/or other creative content from 2022 Fiesta Bowl (December) was copied or moved into 2022 Peach Bowl. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

On the field at midnight?

What was happening on the field at the stroke of midnight? It seemed to me that the field goal attempt may have been in progress. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 05:35, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. The clock struck midnight just before Ohio St. missed the field goal. 98.169.55.40 (talk) 06:25, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually no, need to correct myself. The kick took place in 2022, the TV delayed it until 2023 in certain locations due to latency. However, Georgia still had to kneel the ball one time to officially end the game, so the game did end in 2023. 98.169.55.40 (talk) 20:35, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was watching ESPN. But it is interesting that the game started in 2022 and ended in 2023.Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 05:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure to what extent this discussion is related to the changes on the article of the date to "December 31 - January 1" or the year to "2022 - 2023" so I'll leave this here just in case: it doesn't matter what date the game technically ended on, for the purposes of the "date" of the game we care only when it started. I have also left a message on the talk page of the three IP editors who made these changes, from what I can find. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 06:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Georgia Bulldogs' Midnight Miracle" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Georgia Bulldogs' Midnight Miracle has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 24 § Georgia Bulldogs' Midnight Miracle until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Midnight Miracle" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Midnight Miracle has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 9 § Midnight Miracle until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Riley1012 (talk) 22:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:2022 Peach Bowl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 17:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 15:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will review this article. I will have my initial comments up in the next few days. -Riley1012 (talk) 15:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

Ohio State made their fifth CFP appearance, having won the inaugural CFP national championship game. Should note what year this was, for those who don't know when the CFP began.
- Added "in 2015" to the end of that sentence. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Seventeen unanswered points by Georgia—two touchdowns and a field goal—gave them a three-point lead but a 37-yard pass from quarterback C. J. Stroud... Add a comma after "lead"
- Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The potential game-winning field goal was missed almost exactly as new year began... Should be "as the new year began"
- Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce began organization of the game in 1986 and the location was once again moved to the Georgia Dome... Add a comma after "1986"
- Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
From 2006 to 2013 the game was known as the "Chick-fil-A Bowl"... Add a comma after "2013"
- Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The four teams competing in the Playoff were chosen by the CFP selection committee... I believe "Playoff" should not be capitalized here
- Agreed, done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
...with their only prior game a Georgia victory in the 1993 Florida Citrus Bowl. This sentence would make more sense if you say "only prior game being a Georgia victory..."
- Reworded to "with their only prior game resulting in a Georgia victory..." PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Their CFP debut came in the 2017–18 edition, when they defeated Oklahoma... The comma after "edition" is not necessary
- Removed. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Combine the first four sentences in the "Game Summary" section into one paragraph
- Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
...and three plays later the Buckeyes scored a 31-yard passing touchdown... Add a comma after "later"
- Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Georgia's second drive began with a loss of seven yards but the Bulldogs gained back... Add a comma after "yards"
- Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The win improved Georgia to 14–0 and they advanced... Add a comma after "14-0"
- Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2. Verifiable
The sources used are reliable. Passes Earwig's Copyvio check. Spot check: 5, 9, 14, 19, 22, 23, 29, 30 - All fine.

In the infobox, the Nielsen ratings need a source.
- Added viewership in prose to "Aftermath" with a source. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For ref. 27, change the website parameter to Football Zebras rather than footballzebras.com (for consistency with the other refs.)
- Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3. Broad

The game has been played at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta since January 2018. You could add that this was because the Georgia Dome was demolished in 2017 (which is supported by the source).
- Added. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The aftermath section should say that Georgia went on to win the CFP (since that's mentioned in the lead).
- Added. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, since it is mentioned in the lead, the "Midnight Miracle" nickname needs to be added to the body of the article.
- Added. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

4. Neutral and 5. Stable
No concerns for either criterion.

6. Illustrated
No images, unfortunately.

Hi @PCN02WPS: my suggestions are in bullet points. -Riley1012 (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Riley1012: thank you for the review! Everything has been addressed or responded to. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, everything looks good now! Riley1012 (talk) 22:24, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.