Jump to content

Talk:2022 AFL Women's season 7 Grand Final/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grnrchst (talk · contribs) 10:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Qualification

[edit]
  • I don't think there's any need for the Finals series bracket, as this is already featured in the main article AFL Women's season seven. Especially considering it includes the Grand Final, it is very oddly placed at the beginning of this article.
    Removed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 13:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's some weight issues here. The second paragraph gives a lot of attention to the Demons, but only a single sentence to the Lions. More detail about Brisbane's progress should be added.
  • "It was also the first AFLW grand final to be played in November." Why is this notable?
    The women's game being moved to a different time of year. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 13:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah ok, would be good to mention that then I think, especially considering it factors in later in the article. --Grnrchst (talk) 14:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Venue

[edit]

Broadcast and entertainment

[edit]

Teams

[edit]

Umpires

[edit]

Match summary

[edit]

Scoreboard

[edit]
  • No notes

Best on ground medal

[edit]
  • No notes

Lead and infobox

[edit]
  • Lead is rather short, could you add to it a little? One or two more sentences should be fine.

Checklist

[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    Well-written and easily understandable to someone that isn't familiar with the sport. Links to specialist terminology really help.
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    A few words to watch have been highlighted above.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    Some of the references are incomplete. I've noted examples of the author not being cited (e.g. [3] foxsports) and others of the dates not being cited. Please make sure all references are complete.
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    One noted case of an attributable statement being vaguely cited to "many people". This needs fixing.
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
    Earwig only notes that the umpires section is lifted closely from its cited source. This can be fixed by converting it to a table, per the suggestion.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    There's a couple moments of editorialising, but nothing major, or outside the bounds of how this sport is written about. More weight should be given to the Lions in the qualifications section though.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Stable since January 2023.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    Logo falls under non-free use. Rest of the photographs are original works shared under the Creative Commons license.
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Alt text should be provided for each of the images.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:
    There's a few things that need to be addressed before this can be passed, but they're not major issues and should be easily dealt with. --Grnrchst (talk) 10:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Hawkeye7: Thanks for getting back so swiftly and thoroughly! I will pass this now. Excellent work on this article, it's convinced me that I should give AFL more of a watch this year. :D --Grnrchst (talk) 14:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:2022_AFL_Women%27s_season_7_Grand_Final/GA1&oldid=1181660734"